Literature DB >> 8790311

Screening for prostate cancer: a comparison of urologists and primary care physicians.

J T McKnight1, P H Tietze, B B Adcock, A J Maxwell, W O Smith, M C Nagy.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer screening has assumed increased importance with increasing mortality from this cancer. Newer diagnostic tests such as measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have improved detection of early prostate cancer. To determine practice patterns of prostate cancer screening, surveys were sent to 487 urologists (231 responses) and 542 family physicians (205 responses) in the Southeast inquiring about actual screening practices. In screening asymptomatic patients, the digital rectal examination was used by 99% of the urologists and 98% of the family physicians, with the mean age of screening initiation being 45 +/- 7 years for the urologists and 43 +/- 7 years for the family physicians. Serum PSA was used for screening asymptomatic patients by 98% of the urologists and 87% of the family physicians, with 49 +/- 4 years being the mean age of screening initiation for both specialties. Although differences in screening emerged, both physician groups approximated the recommended screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8790311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

1.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

2.  Brief report: physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen. A national survey.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michael J Barry; Sally W Vernon; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Prostate cancer screening practices and beliefs.

Authors:  J D Voss; J M Schectman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Risks of complication following thyroidectomy.

Authors:  M R Burge; T M Zeise; M W Johnsen; M J Conway; C R Qualls
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn; Anthony Greisinger; Donnie W Aga
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Effect of guidelines on primary care physician use of PSA screening: results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Phyllis A Gimotty; Judy A Shea; José A Pagán; J Sanford Schwartz; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Michelle C Haynes; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Cultural sensitivity and informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michelle C Haynes; Frederick T O'Donnell; Carolyn Bachino; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-12

9.  Prostate cancer screening trends in a large, integrated health care system.

Authors:  Lauren Wallner; Stanley Frencher; Jin-Wen Hsu; Ronald Loo; Joice Huang; Michael Nichol; Steven Jacobsen
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.