Literature DB >> 8789924

Combined immunization of infants with oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines: results of a randomized trial in The Gambia, Oman, and Thailand. WHO Collaborative Study Group on Oral and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccines.

.   

Abstract

To assess an immunization schedule combining oral (OPV) and inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV), we conducted a clinical trial in the Gambia, Oman, and Thailand. Children were randomized to receive one of the following schedules: OPV at birth, 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age; OPV at birth followed by both OPV and IPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age: or placebo at birth followed by IPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. A total of 1685 infants were enrolled; 24-week serum specimens were available for 1291 infants (77%). Across the study sites at 24 weeks of age, the proportion of seropositive children in the combined schedule group was 95-99% for type 1, 99-100% for type 2, and 97-100% for type 3. In the Gambia and Oman, the combined schedule performed significantly better than OPV for type 1 (95-97% versus 88-90%) and type 3 (97-99% versus 72-73%). In the Gambia and Oman, seroprevalences in the IPV group were lower for type 1 (significantly lower in the Gambia); significantly lower for type 2; and significantly higher for type 3, compared with the OPV group. In Thailand, the IPV group had significantly lower proportions of children who were seropositive for each of the three types, compared with the OPV group. The responses to OPV in the Gambia, Oman, and Thailand were consistent with previous studies from these countries. IPV given at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age provided inadequate serological protection against poliovirus, especially type 1. The combined schedule provided the highest levels of serum antibody response, with mucosal immunity equivalent to that produced by OPV alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8789924      PMCID: PMC2486925     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  33 in total

Review 1.  Polio eradication from the Western Hemisphere.

Authors:  C A de Quadros; J K Andrus; J M Olive; C Guerra de Macedo; D A Henderson
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Antibody response of infants to two doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine of enhanced potency.

Authors:  E A Simoes; B Padmini; M C Steinhoff; M Jadhav; T J John
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1985-10

3.  Serological comparisons of approaches to polio vaccination in the Gambia.

Authors:  P Hanlon; L Hanlon; V Marsh; P Byass; H Sillah; R Hayes; H C Whittle; B M Greenwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Lessons from Cuba: mass campaign administration of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine and seroprevalence of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  P Mas Lago; J Ramon Bravo; J K Andrus; M M Comellas; M A Galindo; C A de Quadros; E Bell
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Serological investigation on endemicity of poliomyelitis in Calcutta and in a neighbouring rural area.

Authors:  S R Pal; G Anerjee; B K Aikat
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Comparative evaluation of immunization with live attenuated and enhanced-potency inactivated trivalent poliovirus vaccines in childhood: systemic and local immune responses.

Authors:  H Faden; J F Modlin; M L Thoms; A M McBean; M B Ferdon; P L Ogra
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Serologic response to oral polio vaccine and enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines.

Authors:  A M McBean; M L Thoms; P Albrecht; J C Cuthie; R Bernier
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Efficacy of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in India.

Authors:  R Krishnan; M Jadhav; T J John
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  Randomised trial of alternative formulations of oral poliovaccine in Brazil.

Authors:  P A Patriarca; F Laender; G Palmeira; M J Oliveira; J Lima Filho; M C Dantes; M T Cordeiro; J B Risi; W A Orenstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Poliomyelitis outbreak in Israel in 1988: a report with two commentaries.

Authors:  P E Slater; W A Orenstein; A Morag; A Avni; R Handsher; M S Green; C Costin; A Yarrow; S Rishpon; O Havkin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

1.  Modeling population immunity to support efforts to end the transmission of live polioviruses.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Mark A Pallansch; Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens; Steve G Wassilak; Stephen L Cochi
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Preeradication vaccine policy options for poliovirus infection and disease control.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Mark A Pallansch; Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens; Steve G Wassilak; Jong-Hoon Kim; Stephen L Cochi
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Immunogenicity of sequential inactivated and oral poliovirus vaccines (OPV) versus inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) alone in healthy infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guihua Tang; Wen Yin; Youde Cao; Liming Tan; Shuyu Wu; Yudong Cao; Xianyong Fu; Jing Yan; Xingjun Jiang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Extended delivery of vaccines to the skin improves immune responses.

Authors:  Jessica C Joyce; Hila E Sella; Heather Jost; Matthew J Mistilis; E Stein Esser; Pallab Pradhan; Randall Toy; Marcus L Collins; Paul A Rota; Krishnendu Roy; Ioanna Skountzou; Richard W Compans; M Steven Oberste; William C Weldon; James J Norman; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional dose versus intramuscular full dose of inactivated polio vaccine for prevention of poliomyelitis.

Authors:  Nishant Jaiswal; Shreya Singh; Amit Agarwal; Anil Chauhan; Kiran K Thumburu; Harpreet Kaur; Meenu Singh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  Implementation of coordinated global serotype 2 oral poliovirus vaccine cessation: risks of potential non-synchronous cessation.

Authors:  Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens; Lee M Hampton; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  CXCR3+ T Follicular Helper Cells Induced by Co-Administration of RTS,S/AS01B and Viral-Vectored Vaccines Are Associated With Reduced Immunogenicity and Efficacy Against Malaria.

Authors:  Georgina Bowyer; Amy Grobbelaar; Tommy Rampling; Navin Venkatraman; Danielle Morelle; Ripley W Ballou; Adrian V S Hill; Katie J Ewer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Importation of poliomyelitis by travelers.

Authors:  Annelies Wilder-Smith; Karin Leder; Paul A Tambyah
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 9.  Impact of inactivated poliovirus vaccine on mucosal immunity: implications for the polio eradication endgame.

Authors:  Edward Pk Parker; Natalie A Molodecky; Margarita Pons-Salort; Kathleen M O'Reilly; Nicholas C Grassly
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.217

10.  Serum and mucosal antibody responses to inactivated polio vaccine after sublingual immunization using a thermoresponsive gel delivery system.

Authors:  Jessica A White; Jeremy S Blum; Nancy A Hosken; Joshua O Marshak; Lauren Duncan; Changcheng Zhu; Elizabeth B Norton; John D Clements; David M Koelle; Dexiang Chen; William C Weldon; M Steven Oberste; Manjari Lal
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.