Literature DB >> 8789580

Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise.

M T Hopman1, W M van Teeffelen, J Brouwer, S Houtman, R A Binkhorst.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine mechanical efficiency (ME) and physiological responses during asynchronous (the pedal arms oriented in opposing directions) arm-cranking exercise (AACE) and compare these responses to those obtained during synchronous (the pedal arms oriented in the same direction) arm-cranking exercise (SACE). Ten male subjects participated in the study and performed two exercise tests, one AACE and the other SACE in counter-balanced order. Each test consisted of submaximal (30, 60 and 90 W) and maximal exercise. At 30 W, gross ME was significantly lower during SACE compared to AACE, whereas at 60 W and 90 W no differences between the two types of exercise could be observed. We found that at lower power output levels the flywheel mass and its moment of inertia may have induced more body movements for compensation, which may have been more pronounced during SACE than during AACE. At higher levels of power output this flywheel masseffect was less, which explained the lack of differences in ME at these levels. Physiological responses to maximal AACE or SACE exercise were not significantly different. The results indicated that there were no differences in physiological responses to AACE and SACE exercise at higher exercise intensities. However, at lower levels of power output ME seemed to decrease, most likely as a result of the flywheel-mass effect, which was more pronounced during SACE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8789580     DOI: 10.1007/bf00964124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  16 in total

1.  Dynamic and steady-state ventilatory and gas exchange responses to arm exercise.

Authors:  R Casaburi; T J Barstow; T Robinson; K Wasserman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Cardiovascular responses in paraplegic subjects during arm exercise.

Authors:  M T Hopman; B Oeseburg; R A Binkhorst
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Physiology of upper body exercise.

Authors:  M N Sawka
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 4.  Exercise testing, training and arm ergometry.

Authors:  B A Franklin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Responses to submaximal and maximal arm cycling above, at, and below heart level.

Authors:  T D Cummins; L B Gladden
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Comparison of peak oxygen uptake in arm cranking.

Authors:  R A Washburn; D R Seals
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983

Review 7.  Exercise training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  R Carter; J R Coast; S Idell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The physical and physiological workload of refuse collectors.

Authors:  H C Kemper; R van Aalst; A Leegwater; S Maas; J J Knibbe
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Exercise capacity of individuals with paraplegia.

Authors:  G M Davis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  A physiological comparison of forward vs reverse wheelchair ergometry.

Authors:  A L Linden; G J Holland; S F Loy; W J Vincent
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  10 in total

1.  The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Dale Lovell; Darron Shields; Belinda Beck; Ross Cuneo; Chris McLellan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The influence of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling.

Authors:  Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Helen Alfano; Neil Fowler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Coordinating arms and legs on a hybrid rehabilitation tricycle: the metabolic benefit of asymmetrical compared to symmetrical arm movements.

Authors:  Pieter Meyns; Patricia Van de Walle; Wouter Hoogkamer; Carlotte Kiekens; Kaat Desloovere; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.

Authors:  Asher H Straw; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Eccentric arm cycling: physiological characteristics and potential applications with healthy populations.

Authors:  Steven J Elmer; Camden S Marshall; Keith R McGinnis; Timothy A Van Haitsma; Paul C LaStayo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Victoria Louise Goosey-Tolfrey; Jennifer Helen Kirk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females.

Authors:  C Martyn Beaven; Sarah J Willis; Christian J Cook; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of protocol design on the identification of ventilatory thresholds and the attainment of peak physiological responses during synchronous arm crank ergometry in able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Ingrid Kouwijzer; Mitch Valize; Linda J M Valent; Paul Grandjean Perrenod Comtesse; Lucas H V van der Woude; Sonja de Groot
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effect of Three Different Grip Angles on Physiological Parameters During Laboratory Handcycling Test in Able-Bodied Participants.

Authors:  Thomas Abel; Brendan Burkett; Barbara Thees; Stefan Schneider; Christopher D Askew; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Biomechanical and physiological differences between synchronous and asynchronous low intensity handcycling during practice-based learning in able-bodied men.

Authors:  Cassandra Kraaijenbrink; Riemer J K Vegter; Alexander H R Hensen; Heiko Wagner; Lucas H V van der Woude
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.