Literature DB >> 1470020

Dynamic and steady-state ventilatory and gas exchange responses to arm exercise.

R Casaburi1, T J Barstow, T Robinson, K Wasserman.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that, for the same power output, arm exercise requires higher oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), and ventilation (VE) than leg exercise and that response kinetics are slower. To evaluate these differences, four healthy subjects performed a total of 95 arm cranking tests. Each subject performed several tests at each of three or four power outputs spaced evenly below the maximum the subject could sustain (average = 53 W). Breath-by-breath responses to identical stimuli were averaged. End-exercise blood lactate was determined at each power output. Responses were compared to leg exercise responses in these subjects (J. Appl. Physiol. 67:547-555, 1989). For power outputs unassociated with lactic acidosis, differences between steady-state VO2, VCO2, and VE responses for arm and leg exercise were not significant. At higher power outputs, the higher VO2, VCO2, and VE during arm exercise were well correlated with higher lactate. For power outputs not engendering lactic acidosis, the time constants (tau) for VO2, VCO2 and VE were not greatly different for arm than for leg exercise. For each variable, at higher power outputs tau became longer by an amount correlated with higher lactate level. Like leg exercise, the slower kinetics of VO2 and VE (but not VCO2) at higher power outputs were well described as a superimposed slower component. We conclude that both dynamic and steady-state responses of VE and gas exchange to arm exercise do not differ substantially from those to leg exercise so long as the power output does not elevate blood lactate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1470020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

1.  Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise.

Authors:  M T Hopman; W M van Teeffelen; J Brouwer; S Houtman; R A Binkhorst
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

Review 2.  Oxygen uptake kinetics during exercise.

Authors:  F Xu; E C Rhodes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The VCO2/VO2 relationship during heavy, constant work rate exercise reflects the rate of lactic acid accumulation.

Authors:  W Stringer; K Wasserman; R Casaburi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

4.  Ventilation Limits Aerobic Capacity after Functional Electrical Stimulation Row Training in High Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Shuang Qiu; Saeed Alzhab; Glen Picard; J Andrew Taylor
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics during dynamic upper and lower body exercise: an investigation by time-series analysis.

Authors:  U Drescher; J Koschate; U Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Different ventilatory responses to progressive maximal exercise test performed with either the arms or legs.

Authors:  Renata R T Castro; Sabrina Pedrosa; Antonio C L Nóbrega
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Cardiac, Autonomic, and Cardiometabolic Impact of Exercise Training in Spinal Cord Injury: A QUALITATIVE REVIEW.

Authors:  Isabelle Vivodtzev; J Andrew Taylor
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.646

8.  Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity.

Authors:  Ana Sousa; Fabio Borrani; Ferran A Rodríguez; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Physiological responses and cycle characteristics during double-poling versus diagonal-stride roller-skiing in junior cross-country skiers.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Irina Hämberg; Paulo Cesar Do Nascimento Salvador; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.078

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.