Literature DB >> 17909841

The influence of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling.

Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey1, Helen Alfano, Neil Fowler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling. Eight wheelchair dependent, high performance athletes completed four 4-min submaximal exercise bouts at a constant power output of 90 W over the different experimental conditions (crank length, pedal rate) using a sports hand bike (Draft, Godmanchester, UK). Two different crank lengths (180 and 220 mm) were tested at two different cadences (70 and 85 rev min(-1)) using the synchronous mode of cranking. Physiological measures of oxygen uptake (VO2) minute ventilation, blood lactate (B[La]), heart rate (HR), rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded, gross (GE) and net (NE) efficiency were calculated. A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was applied to determine the effects of crank length, cadence and their interaction on these physiological measures. Both GE and NE were significantly higher and V(O)(2) significantly lower for the 180 mm crank (P < 0.05). No significant main effect was found for cadence on the physiological measures (P > 0.05). Likewise, no interactions between crank length and pedal rate were found. There was however, a trend observed with HR and B[La] often lower with the 180 mm crank, indicating lower physiological stress. The RPE data supported this finding, with a tendency for lower ratings with the 180 mm crank (9 +/- 2 vs. 10 +/- 3). The short crank length when used at 85 rev min(-1) was found to be the most efficient (GE 21.4 +/- 3.1%). In conclusion, crank length has a significant effect on ME in hand cycling. A shorter crank length of 180 mm was found to be more efficient than the 220 mm, regardless of pedal rate during hand cycling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909841     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0576-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  25 in total

1.  Determinants of metabolic cost during submaximal cycling.

Authors:  J McDaniel; J L Durstine; G A Hand; J C Martin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-09

2.  The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics.

Authors:  Brian R Kotajarvi; Michelle B Sabick; Kai-Nan An; Kristin D Zhao; Kenton R Kaufman; Jeffrey R Basford
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-05

3.  Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update.

Authors:  F Péronnet; D Massicotte
Journal:  Can J Sport Sci       Date:  1991-03

4.  Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise.

Authors:  M T Hopman; W M van Teeffelen; J Brouwer; S Houtman; R A Binkhorst
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

5.  Cycling efficiency and pedalling frequency in road cyclists.

Authors:  J Chavarren; J A Calbet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

6.  Wheelchair racing: effects of rim diameter and speed on physiology and technique.

Authors:  L H van der Woude; H E Veeger; R H Rozendal; G J van Ingen Schenau; F Rooth; P van Nierop
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Energy cost and locomotive economy of handbike and rowcycle propulsion by persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K C Maki; W E Langbein; C Reid-Lokos
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1995-05

8.  Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical exercise.

Authors:  K B Pandolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Victoria Louise Goosey-Tolfrey; Jennifer Helen Kirk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  10 in total

1.  Influence of crank length and crank width on maximal hand cycling power and cadence.

Authors:  Christian Krämer; Lutz Hilker; Harald Böhm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Peak and submaximal steady-state metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses during arm-powered and arm-trunk-powered handbike ergometry in able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Joeri Verellen; Christophe Meyer; Luc Janssens; Yves Vanlandewijck
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Wheelchair users' perceived exertion during typical mobility activities.

Authors:  L Qi; M Ferguson-Pell; Z Salimi; R Haennel; A Ramadi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Accuracy and precision of consumer-level activity monitors for stroke detection during wheelchair propulsion and arm ergometry.

Authors:  Jochen Kressler; Joshua Koeplin-Day; Benedikt Muendle; Brice Rosby; Elizabeth Santo; Antoinette Domingo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists.

Authors:  Benjamin Stone; Barry S Mason; Ben T Stephenson; Vicky L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Crank fore-aft position alters the distribution of work over the push and pull phase during synchronous recumbent handcycling of able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Riemer J K Vegter; Barry S Mason; Bastiaan Sporrel; Benjamin Stone; Lucas H V van der Woude; Vicky L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Pragmatic Approach to Resolving Technological Unfairness: the Case of Nike's Vaporfly and Alphafly Running Footwear.

Authors:  Bryce Dyer
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2020-05-24

8.  A novel push-pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment.

Authors:  Thomas A le Rütte; Fransisca Trigo; Luca Bessems; Lucas H V van der Woude; Riemer J K Vegter
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Effect of Three Different Grip Angles on Physiological Parameters During Laboratory Handcycling Test in Able-Bodied Participants.

Authors:  Thomas Abel; Brendan Burkett; Barbara Thees; Stefan Schneider; Christopher D Askew; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Development and Testing of a Novel Arm Cranking-Powered Watercraft.

Authors:  Thomas Fuglsang; Johnny Padulo; Massimo Spoladore; Michele Dalla Piazza; Luca P Ardigò
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.