Literature DB >> 8785647

Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems.

P R Hoskins1.   

Abstract

This study was performed in order to provide quantitative data on the estimation of maximum velocity made using modern Doppler ultrasound systems. This is important since the degree of stenosis within arteries is commonly assessed from the maximum velocity. A string phantom was used as the source of Doppler signals. This enables direct comparison between the Doppler estimated maximum velocity and the true filament velocity. Six modern commercial Doppler systems were used. Measurements were made under standard conditions for each probe. In addition a number of factors were varied in turn (beam-filament angle, filament depth, filament velocity and Doppler aperture position). Under standard conditions the maximum velocity was overestimated in all cases (0-29% error). For all measurements maximum velocity errors ranged from -4% to 47%. There was a large intraprobe variation in maximum velocity estimation (mean variation of 25%), and a large interprobe variation (mean variation of 25%), and a large interprobe variation (mean variation of 18%). These results indicate that, at present, errors in maximum velocity estimation may be directly translated into significant errors in the estimate of the degree of arterial stenosis made from velocity measurements. As a consequence, some patients may be incorrectly categorized. Consideration should be given to applying angle dependent correction factors to maximum velocity measurements, and to the use of conversion from Doppler frequency shift to velocity using the angle derived from the edge of the Doppler aperture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8785647     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

1.  Peak flow velocities in the ascending aorta-real-time phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging vs. cine magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Authors:  Jan M Sohns; Johannes T Kowallick; Arun A Joseph; K Dietmar Merboldt; Dirk Voit; Martin Fasshauer; Wieland Staab; Jens Frahm; Joachim Lotz; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

2.  Computer vision approach for ultrasound Doppler angle estimation.

Authors:  Ashraf A Saad; Thanasis Loupas; Linda G Shapiro
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound. Part 2: Arterial applications.

Authors:  P R Hoskins; P J Fish; W N McDicken; C Moran
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis in children with sickle cell disease - Which transducer, what measurement?

Authors:  Colin R Deane; Benjamin J Freedman; Susan E Height; David C Rees
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-03-16

5.  Comparison of blood velocity measurements between ultrasound Doppler and accelerated phase-contrast MR angiography in small arteries with disturbed flow.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Charles Strother; Kevin Johnson; Sara Baker; Dan Consigny; Oliver Wieben; James Zagzebski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by MR: why, how and when.

Authors:  Ricardo Duarte; Gabriel Fernandez
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

7.  A Protocol for Improved Measurement of Arterial Flow Rate in Preclinical Ultrasound.

Authors:  D A Kenwright; A J W Thomson; P W F Hadoke; T Anderson; C M Moran; G A Gray; P R Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2015-11-03

8.  Upper limb vascular mapping with Doppler ultrasound: Technique precision evaluated in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ana S Germano; António P Gomes; Rita Martins; Marta Sousa; Vitor Nunes
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-06-02

9.  Testing a new surfactant in a widely-used blood mimic for ultrasound flow imaging.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhou; Peter R Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-09-29

10.  Levels of agreement in the measurements of carotid artery ultrasound across a regional vascular network.

Authors:  Mervyn Alexander McKenna; Michelle Clare Bonfield; Teresa Robinson
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.