Literature DB >> 8778432

The mildly abnormal cervical smear: patient anxiety and choice of management.

M H Jones1, A Singer, D Jenkins.   

Abstract

Argument continues over the best management of women with a first mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear: should they be referred for prompt colposcopy, or should they be kept under cytological review, with recourse to colposcopy if the abnormality persists? One consideration is the amount of anxiety generated. We measured anxiety, retrospectively, in two groups of women who had been managed by one or other method. Colposcopy caused more anxiety than cytological surveillance. When told that their smear was mildly abnormal, 47% of the immediate-colposcopy group (n = 182), compared with 33% of the surveillance group (n = 163), thought they had cancer. None the less, there was a general preference for immediate colposcopy. Whatever the relative merits of these two strategies for clinical management, it is clear that both forms of screening, and especially colposcopy, demand better information for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8778432      PMCID: PMC1295776     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

1.  Anxieties in women undergoing colposcopy.

Authors:  T M Marteau; P Walker; J Giles; M Smail
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-09

2.  Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance.

Authors:  M H Jones; D Jenkins; J Cuzick; M R Wolfendale; J J Jones; C Balogun-Lynch; M M Usherwood; A Singer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear.

Authors:  M J Campion; J R Brown; D J McCance; W Atia; R Edwards; J Cuzick; A Singer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-02
  3 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Routine Treatment of Cervical Cytological Cell Changes: Diagnostic Standard, Prevention and Routine Treatment of Cervical Cytological Cell Changes - An Assessment of Primary and Secondary Prevention and Routine Treatment Data in the Context of an Anonymous Data Collection from Practicing Gynaecologists; an Academic, Non-Interventional Study.

Authors:  J Huber; B Pötsch; M Gantschacher; M Templ
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Anxiety among women with mild dyskaryosis: a randomized trial of an educational intervention.

Authors:  T Peters; M Somerset; K Baxter; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.

Authors:  A al-Nafussi; G Rebello; R al-Yusif; E McGoogan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

6.  Psychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countries.

Authors:  Joseph Monsonego; Javier Cortes; Daniel Pereira da Silva; Anna Francisca Jorge; Patrick Klein
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Psychosocial impact of alternative management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities: results from the TOMBOLA randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Seonaidh Cotton; Julian Little; Nicola M Gray; Margaret Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Norman Waugh; Leslie Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.