Literature DB >> 8776295

Factors associated with screening mammography in low-income women.

H B Hedegaard1, A J Davidson, R A Wright.   

Abstract

Despite its effectiveness as a preventive measure, studies indicate that low-income and minority women are less likely to obtain screening mammograms than other groups. Using a logistic regression model to adjust for multiple variables, we examined factors associated with women age > or = 40 years of age who obtained a screening mammogram in a community health center setting from 1990 to 1991 (screened, n = 3,521; nonscreened, n = 7,461). Women 50-64 were more likely to be screened than women 40-49 (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.42, 1.73). Native American, Asian, and women of other races were less likely to be screened than Caucasian, African-American, or Hispanic women (adjusted RR = 0.66; CI = 0.51, 0.87). Women on Medicaid were twice as likely to be screened than women who received no subsidized care (adjusted RR = 1.99; CI = 1.68, 2.35). Women who received the majority of their care at a community-based health clinic were twice as likely to be screened than women who received care primarily at a hospital-based ambulatory care site (adjusted RR = 2.34; CI = 2.06, 2.65). The greatest difference in adjusted RR was seen for women who had > or = 4 visits per year compared to women with < 4 visits (RR = 4.6; CI = 4.18, 5.06). On average, women in the screened population had fewer emergency room visits and more primary care and specialty clinic visits compared to the nonscreened population. Reducing the cost of mammography to the patient and providing systems for physician referral from hospital-based settings (emergency rooms, specialty clinics) may help increase the number of low-income and minority women who obtain screening mammograms. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): mammography, screening, community health center, low-income, minority.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8776295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  13 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  The effects of insurance coverage and ethnicity on mammography utilization in a postmenopausal population.

Authors:  R A Bush; R D Langer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-04

4.  A multimedia breast cancer education intervention for low-income Latinas.

Authors:  Armando Valdez; Kakoli Banerjee; Lynn Ackerson; Maria Fernandez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-02

5.  Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Factors related to noncompliance with screening mammogram appointments among low-income African-American women.

Authors:  S R Crump; R M Mayberry; B D Taylor; K P Barefield; P E Thomas
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Assessing screening mammography utilization in an urban area.

Authors:  Bruce Allen; Roshan Bastani; Shahrzad Bazargan; Earl Leonard
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Racial differences in breast cancer screening, knowledge and compliance.

Authors:  Dawne M Harris; Jane E Miller; Diane M Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy LaPelle; Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Milagros C Rosal; Mary Jo White; Jennifer Rider Stark
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.771

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.