Literature DB >> 8775241

Sharing antenatal care: client satisfaction and use of the 'patient-held record'.

J Webster1, K Forbes, S Foster, I Thomas, A Griffin, H Timms.   

Abstract

Two hundred women (148 shared care patients and 52 clinic patients) completed a questionnaire about care received during pregnancy and the use of a patient-held record. Women receiving shared care reported higher levels of satisfaction with their care than clinic patients (p < 0.0001). Thirty-six percent of the women in shared care forgot to take their record to an appointment on at least 1 occasion. During the pregnancy, over half of the respondents in both groups made contact with the hospital for reasons other than for their regular visit. For both groups, convenience was the most frequently reported reason for choosing their model of care. Other important issues for shared care patients were that the service was more personal and more information was provided. Among clinic patients, safety and quality of care were identified as important. Problems involved with the patient holding the only complete pregnancy record are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8775241     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb02912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  8 in total

Review 1.  Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?

Authors:  Rupert Fawdry; Susan Bewley; Grant Cumming; Helga Perry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Helen J Smith; Rintaro Mori; Hisashi Noma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-14

Review 3.  The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Patients' views on the effectiveness of patient-held records: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Samantha A Sartain; Samantha Stressing; Jacqui Prieto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Improving stroke patients' care: a patient held record is not enough.

Authors:  M Ayana; P Pound; F Lampe; S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  See How They Grow: Testing the feasibility of a mobile app to support parents' understanding of child growth charts.

Authors:  Gayl Humphrey; Rosie Dobson; Varsha Parag; Marion Hiemstra; Stephen Howie; Samantha Marsh; Susan Morton; Dylan Mordaunt; Angela Wadham; Chris Bullen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries?

Authors:  Kathleen E Turner; Sherrilynne Fuller
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-11-07

Review 8.  In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Glenda Hawley; Tina Janamian; Claire Jackson; Shelley A Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.