Literature DB >> 8768180

Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects.

C S Royden1, E C Hildreth.   

Abstract

When moving toward a stationary scene, people judge their heading quite well from visual information alone. Much experimental and modeling work has been presented to analyze how people judge their heading for stationary scenes. However, in everyday life, we often move through scenes that contain moving objects. Most models have difficulty computing heading when moving objects are in the scene, and few studies have examined how well humans perform in the presence of moving objects. In this study, we tested how well people judge their heading in the presence of moving objects. We found that people perform remarkably well under a variety of conditions. The only condition that affects an observer's ability to judge heading accurately consists of a large moving object crossing the observer's path. In this case, the presence of the object causes a small bias in the heading judgments. For objects moving horizontally with respect to the observer, this bias is in the object's direction of motion. These results present a challenge for computational models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8768180     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  31 in total

1.  Ideal observer for heading judgments.

Authors:  J A Crowell; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control.

Authors:  I R Johnston; G R White; R W Cumming
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1973-06

3.  Visual guidance of locomotion.

Authors:  K R Llewellyn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-12

4.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  H Saito; M Yukie; K Tanaka; K Hikosaka; Y Fukada; E Iwai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Processing differential image motion.

Authors:  J H Rieger; D T Lawton
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  An illusory transformation of optic flow fields.

Authors:  C J Duffy; R H Wurtz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading.

Authors:  A V van den Berg; E Brenner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Estimating heading during eye movements.

Authors:  C S Royden; J A Crowell; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Analysis of misperceived observer motion during simulated eye rotations.

Authors:  C S Royden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  J A Perrone; L S Stone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  23 in total

1.  Approaching objects cause confusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease regarding their direction of self-movement.

Authors:  Mark Mapstone; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The temporal dynamics of heading perception in the presence of moving objects.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual and nonvisual contributions to three-dimensional heading selectivity in the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Paul V Watkins; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial reference frames of visual, vestibular, and multimodal heading signals in the dorsal subdivision of the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Sentao Wang; Yong Gu; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  An effect of relative motion on trajectory discrimination.

Authors:  Scott A Beardsley; Lucia M Vaina
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Dissociation of Self-Motion and Object Motion by Linear Population Decoding That Approximates Marginalization.

Authors:  Ryo Sasaki; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Visual-vestibular cue integration for heading perception: applications of optimal cue integration theory.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Does optic flow parsing depend on prior estimation of heading?

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton; Andrew J Foulkes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.