Literature DB >> 18304601

An effect of relative motion on trajectory discrimination.

Scott A Beardsley1, Lucia M Vaina.   

Abstract

Psychophysical studies point to the existence of specialized mechanisms sensitive to the relative motion between an object and its background. Such mechanisms would seem ideal for the motion-based segmentation of objects; however, their properties and role in processing the visual scene remain unclear. Here we examine the contribution of relative motion mechanisms to the processing of object trajectory. In a series of four psychophysical experiments we examine systematically the effects of relative direction and speed differences on the perceived trajectory of an object against a moving background. We show that background motion systematically influences the discrimination of object direction. Subjects' ability to discriminate direction was consistently better for objects moving opposite a translating background than for objects moving in the same direction as the background. This effect was limited to the case of a translating background and did not affect perceived trajectory for more complex background motions associated with self-motion. We interpret these differences as providing support for the role of relative motion mechanisms in the segmentation and representation of object motions that do not occlude the path of an observer's self-motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18304601      PMCID: PMC3171136          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  35 in total

1.  Summation between nearby motion signals and facilitative/inhibitory interactions between distant motion signals.

Authors:  K Ido; Y Ohtani; Y Ejima
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Specificity of projections from wide-field and local motion-processing regions within the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey.

Authors:  V K Berezovskii; R T Born
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The role of relative motion computation in 'direction repulsion'.

Authors:  S C Dakin; I Mareschal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Interaction of first- and second-order direction in motion-defined motion.

Authors:  J M Zanker; N R Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  The perception and discrimination of speed in complex motion.

Authors:  C W Clifford; S A Beardsley; L M Vaina
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Can spatial and temporal motion integration compensate for deficits in local motion mechanisms?

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Norberto M Gryzwacz; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Marjorie LeMay; Don C Bienfang; Alan Cowey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Speed tuning of direction repulsion describes an inverted U-function.

Authors:  William Curran; Christopher P Benton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing.

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Joseph S Lappin; Lee A Gilroy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Critical band masking in optic flow.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Network       Date:  2005 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 1.273

10.  Center-surround interactions in the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey.

Authors:  R T Born
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.