Literature DB >> 8351820

An illusory transformation of optic flow fields.

C J Duffy1, R H Wurtz.   

Abstract

We compared a human observer's ability to locate the focus of expansion (FOE) of a radial optic flow field when this flow field was either combined with, or overlapped by, planar motion. With combined stimuli, in which the FOE was displaced in the direction opposite to the planar motion, subjects accurately located the displaced FOE. With overlapping (transparent) stimuli and the FOE remaining in the center of the display, we found an illusory transformation of the radial pattern: the focus of expansion appeared to be shifted in the direction of the planar motion. The speed of both the planar and radial patterns of motion influenced the illusion. Presence or absence of visual fixation had little effect. We suggest that this illusion might provide a clue as to the way the brain processes planar and radial motion which might in turn be relevant to the interaction of the planar and radial motion components of optic flow fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351820     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90141-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Receptive field dynamics underlying MST neuronal optic flow selectivity.

Authors:  Chen Ping Yu; William K Page; Roger Gaborski; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Population anisotropy in area MT explains a perceptual difference between near and far disparity motion segmentation.

Authors:  Finnegan J Calabro; Lucia M Vaina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Ingrid Scharlau; Kirsten Labudda
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-12-18

4.  A model for encoding multiple object motions and self-motion in area MST of primate visual cortex.

Authors:  R S Zemel; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects.

Authors:  C S Royden; E C Hildreth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

7.  Temporal integration of focus position signal during compensation for pursuit in optic flow.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg; Albert van den Berg; Richard van Wezel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Perception of object motion during self-motion: Correlated biases in judgments of heading direction and object motion.

Authors:  Xing Xing; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Does optic flow parsing depend on prior estimation of heading?

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton; Andrew J Foulkes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.