Literature DB >> 8765557

Chick eye optics: zero to fourteen days.

E L Irving1, J G Sivak, T A Curry, M G Callender.   

Abstract

Ocular dimensions and refractive state data for chicks 0 to 14 days of age were obtained from 234 untreated control eyes of birds treated unilaterally in previous work involving various defocussing lenses and/or translucent goggles. Refractive state and corneal curvatures were measured in vivo by retinoscopy and ophthalmometry respectively. Intraocular dimensions were measured by A-scan ultrasonography, after which the eyes were removed, weighed and measured. In some cases (n = 52) intraocular dimensions and lens curvatures were obtained from frozen sections of enucleated eyes. The hyperopia of hatchling chicks (+6.5 +/- 4.0 D) initially decreases rapidly and then more gradually to +2.0 +/- 0.5 D by 16 days. The distribution of refractive errors is very broad at Day 0, but becomes leptokurtotic, with a slight myopic skew, by Day 14. Corneal radius is constant for the first four days, possible as a result of pre-hatching lid pressure, and then increases linearly, as do all lens dimensions, axial diameter and equatorial diameter. Schematic eyes were developed for Days 0, 7, and 14.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8765557     DOI: 10.1007/bf00222785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  24 in total

1.  Refraction and its components during the growth of the eye from the age of three.

Authors:  A SORSBY; B BENJAMIN; M SHERIDAN; J STONE; G A LEARY
Journal:  Memo Med Res Counc       Date:  1961

2.  Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye.

Authors:  E L Irving; J G Sivak; M G Callender
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Experimentally induced myopia in chicks: morphometric and biochemical analysis during the first 14 days after hatching.

Authors:  R L Pickett-Seltner; J G Sivak; J J Pasternak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  [Biometric observations on the eyes of infants born at full term and of premature infants during their first year].

Authors:  A Grignolo; A Rivara
Journal:  Ann Ocul (Paris)       Date:  1968-08

5.  Differences in eye growth and the response to visual deprivation in different strains of chicken.

Authors:  D Troilo; T Li; A Glasser; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Inducing ametropias in hatchling chicks by defocus--aperture effects and cylindrical lenses.

Authors:  E L Irving; M G Callender; J G Sivak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  D Troilo; S J Judge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks.

Authors:  E L Irving; M G Callender; J G Sivak
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Longitudinal evidence of crystalline lens thinning in children.

Authors:  K Zadnik; D O Mutti; R E Fusaro; A J Adams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The eyes of young chickens grow toward emmetropia.

Authors:  J Wallman; J I Adams; J N Trachtman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  10 in total

1.  The effective add inherent in 2-zone negative lenses inhibits eye growth in myopic young chicks.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Christine Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia.

Authors:  Marsha L Kisilak; Melanie C W Campbell; Jennifer J Hunter; Elizabeth L Irving; Lan Huang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Ocular wavefront aberrations in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus: effects of age and refractive error.

Authors:  Nancy J Coletta; Susana Marcos; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A detailed paraxial schematic eye for the White Leghorn chick.

Authors:  Natalia V Avila; Sally A McFadden
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of crystalline lens dimensions in chicken.

Authors:  Rebecca J Tattersall; Ankush Prashar; Krish D Singh; Pawel F Tokarczuk; Jonathan T Erichsen; Paul M Hocking; Jeremy A Guggenheim
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  In vivo volumetric imaging of chicken retina with ultrahigh-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Alireza Akhlagh Moayed; Sepideh Hariri; Eun Sun Song; Vivian Choh; Kostadinka Bizheva
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Effects of optically imposed astigmatism on early eye growth in chicks.

Authors:  Chin Hung Geoffrey Chu; Chea Su Kee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effects of actomyosin disruptors on the mechanical integrity of the avian crystalline lens.

Authors:  Gah-Jone Won; Douglas S Fudge; Vivian Choh
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Short term optical defocus perturbs normal developmental shifts in retina/RPE protein abundance.

Authors:  Nina Riddell; Pierre Faou; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.978

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.