Literature DB >> 20800078

Ocular wavefront aberrations in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus: effects of age and refractive error.

Nancy J Coletta1, Susana Marcos, David Troilo.   

Abstract

The common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus, is a primate model for emmetropization studies. The refractive development of the marmoset eye depends on visual experience, so knowledge of the optical quality of the eye is valuable. We report on the wavefront aberrations of the marmoset eye, measured with a clinical Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (COAS, AMO Wavefront Sciences). Aberrations were measured on both eyes of 23 marmosets whose ages ranged from 18 to 452 days. Twenty-one of the subjects were members of studies of emmetropization and accommodation, and two were untreated normal subjects. Eleven of the 21 experimental subjects had worn monocular diffusers and 10 had worn binocular spectacle lenses of equal power. Monocular deprivation or lens rearing began at about 45 days of age and ended at about 108 days of age. All refractions and aberration measures were performed while the eyes were cyclopleged; most aberration measures were made while subjects were awake, but some control measurements were performed under anesthesia. Wavefront error was expressed as a seventh-order Zernike polynomial expansion, using the Optical Society of America's naming convention. Aberrations in young marmosets decreased up to about 100 days of age, after which the higher-order RMS aberration leveled off to about 0.10 μm over a 3 mm diameter pupil. Higher-order aberrations were 1.8 times greater when the subjects were under general anesthesia than when they were awake. Young marmoset eyes were characterized by negative spherical aberration. Form-deprived eyes of the monocular deprivation animals had greater wavefront aberrations than their fellow untreated eyes, particularly for asymmetric aberrations in the odd-numbered Zernike orders. Both lens-treated and form-deprived eyes showed similar significant increases in Z3(-3) trefoil aberration, suggesting the increase in trefoil may be related to factors that do not involve visual feedback.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20800078      PMCID: PMC4169274          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  63 in total

1.  Chick eye optics: zero to fourteen days.

Authors:  E L Irving; J G Sivak; T A Curry; M G Callender
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Form-deprivation myopia in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Marcus H C Howlett; Sally A McFadden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A four-surface schematic eye of macaque monkey obtained by an optical method.

Authors:  P Lapuerta; S J Schein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Debora L Nickla
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks.

Authors:  C Wildsoet; J Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Blur on the retina due to higher-order aberrations: comparison of eye growth models to experimental data.

Authors:  Jennifer J Hunter; Melanie C W Campbell; Marsha L Kisilak; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  D Troilo; S J Judge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Refractive state of tree shrew eyes measured with cortical visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Thomas T Norton; Wende W Wu; John T Siegwart
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Optical aberrations in the mouse eye.

Authors:  Elena García de la Cera; Guadalupe Rodríguez; Lourdes Llorente; Frank Schaeffel; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state.

Authors:  J Wallman; C Wildsoet; A Xu; M D Gottlieb; D L Nickla; L Marran; W Krebs; A M Christensen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Relationship between higher-order aberrations and myopia progression in schoolchildren: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Xu-Bo Yang; Wen-Qiu Zhang; Long-Qian Liu; Guang-Jing Dong; Tao-Wen Chen; Meng Liao; Xuan Liao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Three-dimensional OCT based guinea pig eye model: relating morphology and optics.

Authors:  Pablo Pérez-Merino; Miriam Velasco-Ocana; Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; Luis Revuelta; Sally A McFadden; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  The effects of reduced ambient lighting on lens compensation in infant rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Zhihui She; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Krista M Beach; Earl L Smith Iii
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.984

Review 5.  A simpler primate brain: the visual system of the marmoset monkey.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Marcello G P Rosa
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.