Literature DB >> 7610582

Differences in eye growth and the response to visual deprivation in different strains of chicken.

D Troilo1, T Li, A Glasser, H C Howland.   

Abstract

Several laboratories studying visual deprivation myopia in the domestic chick report varying degrees of axial elongation and myopia induced by similar visual deprivation techniques. In this study we tested the hypothesis that in different strains of chick the eyes respond differently to visual deprivation. We compared under identical conditions two strains of White Leghorn chick commonly used in ocular development research--the Cornell-K strain (K) and Washington H & N Strain (H/N). The normal development of the eye was found to vary significantly between these strains of White Leghorn chicks. The K strain normally develops flatter corneas, thicker lenses, and larger eyes than the H/N strain. The response to visual deprivation also varies significantly between strains. For example, we find that 2 weeks of visual deprivation in the K strain results in less elongation of the vitreous chamber and flattening of the cornea yielding lower levels of induced myopia compared to the H/N strain. Our results show that while visual experience clearly affects normal ocular development in both strains of chick, the nature of the effect depends upon not only the type and duration of the experience but the genetics of the subject population as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7610582     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00230-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

1.  Constant light rearing disrupts compensation to imposed- but not induced-hyperopia and facilitates compensation to imposed myopia in chicks.

Authors:  Varuna Padmanabhan; Jennifer Shih; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Chick eye optics: zero to fourteen days.

Authors:  E L Irving; J G Sivak; T A Curry; M G Callender
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  The chick eye in vision research: An excellent model for the study of ocular disease.

Authors:  C Ellis Wisely; Javed A Sayed; Heather Tamez; Chris Zelinka; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Andy J Fischer; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 5.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Dynamic changes of ocular biometric parameters: a modified form-deprivation myopia model of young guinea pigs.

Authors:  Hai-Lan Zhao; Rui-Qin Wang; Miao-Qin Wu; Jin Jiang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Nature of the refractive errors in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with experimentally induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ying Qiao-Grider; Li-Fang Hung; Chea-Su Kee; Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Ocular wavefront aberrations in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus: effects of age and refractive error.

Authors:  Nancy J Coletta; Susana Marcos; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Breed- and gender-dependent differences in eye growth and form deprivation responses in chick.

Authors:  K Schmid; C Wildsoet
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  A comparison of refractive development between two subspecies of infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Ying Qiao-Grider; Li-Fang Hung; Chea-su Kee; Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.