Literature DB >> 8763803

Life style intervention in general practice: effects on psychological well-being and patient satisfaction.

E Meland1, E Laerum, J G Maeland.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: (1) study if an opportunistic screening of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors among male attenders in general practice (GP) influenced the overall subjective satisfaction with life of persons labelled 'high risk' compared to other screened persons; (2) compare psychological well-being and patient satisfaction in a patient centred and self-directive (PCSD) intervention with conventional care (CC); and (3) evaluate patient satisfaction and psychological well-being among subjects with high CHD risk during a one year intervention study. Effects of 'labelling' were evaluated in 115 subjects with high CHD risk in comparison with a low risk reference population. The 22 participating GP centres were randomly allocated to follow either a PCSD intervention or a CC approach. An overall satisfaction with life question was employed and psychological well-being were measured using the General Health Questionnaire (20 item version). Satisfaction measures on health care aspects were also included. No difference of change between the high risk and the reference population was found concerning satisfaction with life after screening. No significant difference of change was found within or between the PCSD and the CC group concerning emotional well-being or overall satisfaction with life during one year intervention. Satisfaction with the care received was significantly better in the CC group as compared with the PCSD group (p = 0.02). Satisfaction with own efforts for improving health was, however, more pronounced in the PCSD group (p = 0.01). A substantial number (n = 61) of the participants reported distaste of being reminded of the risk of heart disease and no more than 60 of the participants were satisfied with their own efforts for improving health. Although no significant change of satisfaction with life and emotional well-being due to screening or intervention could be detected, clinicians should be aware that encouraging patients to change life style may lead to patients' annoyance of being reminded of the risk of disease and dissatisfaction with their own efforts. Increasing patient responsibility and self-determination may improve their satisfaction with their own efforts, but reduce satisfaction with medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8763803     DOI: 10.1007/bf00433919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  22 in total

1.  Awareness of high blood pressure influences on psychological and sympathetic responses.

Authors:  M Rostrup; O Ekeberg
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Assessment of coronary heart disease risk, II. A clinical multicentre study of general practitioners' risk assessment.

Authors:  E Meland; E Laerum; E H Lehmann
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Effect of antihypertensives on sexual function and quality of life: the TAIM Study.

Authors:  S Wassertheil-Smoller; M D Blaufox; A Oberman; B R Davis; C Swencionis; M O Knerr; C M Hawkins; H G Langford
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Can health screening damage your health?

Authors:  H G Stoate
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

5.  'Advise yes, dictate no'. Patients' views on health promotion in the consultation.

Authors:  N C Stott; R M Pill
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 6.  Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  D L Roter
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

7.  Patient satisfaction and design of treatment. Results from a study of two different ways of treating hypertension.

Authors:  A Carlberg
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

9.  The psychosocial impact of mass screening for cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  T Tymstra; B Bieleman
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Increasing the efficacy of physician-delivered smoking interventions: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J K Ockene; J Kristeller; R Goldberg; T L Amick; P S Pekow; D Hosmer; M Quirk; K Kalan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Si; John R Moss; Thomas R Sullivan; Skye S Newton; Nigel P Stocks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Eric Crespo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.