Literature DB >> 8762136

Self-consistently optimized statistical mechanical energy functions for sequence structure alignment.

K K Koretke1, Z Luthey-Schulten, P G Wolynes.   

Abstract

A quantitative form of the principle of minimal frustration is used to obtain from a database analysis statistical mechanical energy functions and gap parameters for aligning sequences to three-dimensional structures. The analysis that partially takes into account correlations in the energy landscape improves upon the previous approximations of Goldstein et al. (1994, 1995) (Goldstein R, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes P, 1994, Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press. pp 306-315; Goldstein R, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes P, 1995, In: Elber R, ed. New developments in theoretical studies of proteins. Singapore: World Scientific). The energy function allows for ordering of alignments based on the compatibility of a sequence to be in a given structure (i.e., lowest energy) and therefore removes the necessity of using percent identity or similarity as scoring parameters. The alignments produced by the energy function on distant homologues with low percent identity (less than 21%) are generally better than those generated with evolutionary information. The lowest energy alignment generated with the energy function for sequences containing prosite signatures but unknown structures is a structure containing the same prosite signature, providing a check on the robustness of the algorithm. Finally, the energy function can make use of known experimental evidence as constraints within the alignment algorithm to aid in finding the correct structural alignment.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8762136      PMCID: PMC2143433          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  41 in total

1.  The molecular structure of a dimer composed of the variable portions of the Bence-Jones protein REI refined at 2.0-A resolution.

Authors:  O Epp; E E Lattman; M Schiffer; R Huber; W Palm
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1975-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem.

Authors:  A Godzik; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein.

Authors:  R Srinivasan; G D Rose
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-06

4.  Structure of myoglobin refined at 2-0 A resolution. II. Structure of deoxymyoglobin from sperm whale.

Authors:  T Takano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Stoichiometry and redox behaviour of metals in cytochrome-c oxidase.

Authors:  G C Steffens; T Soulimane; G Wolff; G Buse
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1993-05-01

6.  Structure at 2.8 A resolution of cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans.

Authors:  S Iwata; C Ostermeier; B Ludwig; H Michel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Development of pseudoenergy potentials for assessing protein 3-D-1-D compatibility and detecting weak homologies.

Authors:  K Nishikawa; Y Matsuo
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1993-11

8.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structure and function of the xenobiotic substrate binding site of a glutathione S-transferase as revealed by X-ray crystallographic analysis of product complexes with the diastereomers of 9-(S-glutathionyl)-10-hydroxy-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene.

Authors:  X Ji; W W Johnson; M A Sesay; L Dickert; S M Prasad; H L Ammon; R N Armstrong; G L Gilliland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-02-08       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Restoration of a lost metal-binding site: construction of two different copper sites into a subunit of the E. coli cytochrome o quinol oxidase complex.

Authors:  J van der Oost; P Lappalainen; A Musacchio; A Warne; L Lemieux; J Rumbley; R B Gennis; R Aasa; T Pascher; B G Malmström
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  15 in total

1.  Scoring functions in protein folding and design.

Authors:  R I Dima; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Associative memory hamiltonians for structure prediction without homology: alpha-helical proteins.

Authors:  C Hardin; M P Eastwood; Z Luthey-Schulten; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A method for parameter optimization in computational biology.

Authors:  J B Rosen; A T Phillips; S Y Oh; K A Dill
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Protein threading by learning.

Authors:  I Chang; M Cieplak; R I Dima; A Maritan; J R Banavar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Associative memory Hamiltonians for structure prediction without homology: alpha/beta proteins.

Authors:  Corey Hardin; Michael P Eastwood; Michael C Prentiss; Zadia Luthey-Schulten; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Wurst: a protein threading server with a structural scoring function, sequence profiles and optimized substitution matrices.

Authors:  Andrew E Torda; James B Procter; Thomas Huber
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles.

Authors:  Marc A Marti-Renom; M S Madhusudhan; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  An information theoretic approach to macromolecular modeling: I. Sequence alignments.

Authors:  Tiba Aynechi; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Protein structure prediction using basin-hopping.

Authors:  Michael C Prentiss; David J Wales; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Restriction versus guidance in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Joseph A Hegler; Joachim Lätzer; Amarda Shehu; Cecilia Clementi; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.