Literature DB >> 11106591

A method for parameter optimization in computational biology.

J B Rosen1, A T Phillips, S Y Oh, K A Dill.   

Abstract

Models in computational biology, such as those used in binding, docking, and folding, are often empirical and have adjustable parameters. Because few of these models are yet fully predictive, the problem may be nonoptimal choices of parameters. We describe an algorithm called ENPOP (energy function parameter optimization) that improves-and sometimes optimizes-the parameters for any given model and for any given search strategy that identifies the stable state of that model. ENPOP iteratively adjusts the parameters simultaneously to move the model global minimum energy conformation for each of m different molecules as close as possible to the true native conformations, based on some appropriate measure of structural error. A proof of principle is given for two very different test problems. The first involves three different two-dimensional model protein molecules having 12 to 37 monomers and four parameters in common. The parameters converge to the values used to design the model native structures. The second problem involves nine bumpy landscapes, each having between 4 and 12 degrees of freedom. For the three adjustable parameters, the globally optimal values are known in advance. ENPOP converges quickly to the correct parameter set.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11106591      PMCID: PMC1301162          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76520-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  16 in total

1.  Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized Hamiltonians with local interactions.

Authors:  R A Goldstein; Z A Luthey-Schulten; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins.

Authors:  V N Maiorov; G M Crippen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force.

Authors:  M Hendlich; P Lackner; S Weitckus; H Floeckner; R Froschauer; K Gottsbacher; G Casari; M J Sippl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  How optimization of potential functions affects protein folding.

Authors:  M H Hao; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Self-consistently optimized statistical mechanical energy functions for sequence structure alignment.

Authors:  K K Koretke; Z Luthey-Schulten; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures.

Authors:  P D Thomas; K A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels.

Authors:  K A Dill; H S Chan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1997-01

8.  Lattice model for rapidly folding protein-like heteropolymers.

Authors:  I Shrivastava; S Vishveshwara; M Cieplak; A Maritan; J R Banavar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Learning about protein folding via potential functions.

Authors:  V N Maiorov; G M Crippen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-10

10.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.