Literature DB >> 8759453

Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent.

W Seiple1, J P Szlyk, S Yang, K Holopigian.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found an increase in peripheral target localization errors in normally sighted older adults. These results have been interpreted as indicative of a constriction of the "useful field of view". In the present study, we parametrically manipulated masking, distractors and stimulus luminance and examined the relationships between peripheral target localization and age. We found that backward masking and/or flashed distractors increased error rates. This decrement in performance was larger for more peripherally located targets and largest for the older subjects at all stimulus locations. Stimulus luminance (either 2 or 78 cd/m2) had no effect on peripheral localization performance at any age. We also demonstrated that all subjects, regardless of age, had higher localization error rates to more peripherally located targets. In older subjects, error rates increased equally at all eccentricities; that is, there was an eccentricity independent increase in the number of target localization errors as a function of age. This finding does not support the interpretation of a selective constriction of the functional visual field in older subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8759453     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00288-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection.

Authors:  H L Pringle; D E Irwin; A F Kramer; P Atchley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Effect of age and pop out distracter on attended field of view.

Authors:  Raiju J Babu; Susan J Leat; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-03-20

3.  Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.

Authors:  Jing Feng; Fergus I M Craik; Brian Levine; Sylvain Moreno; Gary Naglie; HeeSun Choi
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2016-10-11

4.  Visual processing speed.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?

Authors:  Melissa Lunsman; Jerri D Edwards; Ross Andel; Brent J Small; Karlene K Ball; Daniel L Roenker
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

7.  Cognitive and vision loss affects the topography of the attentional visual field.

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; Kathleen A Turano; Beatriz Muñoz; Cynthia Munro; Karen Bandeen Roche; Sheila K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The effects of age and cognitive load on peripheral-detection performance.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lauren P Spano; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Effects of age and eccentricity on visual target detection.

Authors:  Nicole Gruber; René M Müri; Urs P Mosimann; Rahel Bieri; Andrea Aeschimann; Giuseppe A Zito; Prabitha Urwyler; Thomas Nyffeler; Tobias Nef
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.