Literature DB >> 23231958

Visual processing speed.

Cynthia Owsley1.   

Abstract

Older adults commonly report difficulties in visual tasks of everyday living that involve visual clutter, secondary task demands, and time sensitive responses. These difficulties often cannot be attributed to visual sensory impairment. Techniques for measuring visual processing speed under divided attention conditions and among visual distractors have been developed and have established construct validity in that those older adults performing poorly in these tests are more likely to exhibit daily visual task performance problems. Research suggests that computer-based training exercises can increase visual processing speed in older adults and that these gains transfer to enhancement of health and functioning and a slowing in functional and health decline as people grow older.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Attention; Everyday visual tasks; Useful field of view; Visual processing speed

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231958      PMCID: PMC3615057          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  65 in total

1.  VISUAL SEARCH.

Authors:  U NEISSER
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  AN AGE-DECREMENT IN THE ABILITY TO IGNORE IRRELEVANT INFORMATION.

Authors:  P RABBITT
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1965-04

3.  Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: current and future implications.

Authors:  Olivio J Clay; Virginia G Wadley; Jerri D Edwards; David L Roth; Daniel L Roenker; Karlene K Ball
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance.

Authors:  J D Edwards; V G Wadley; D E Vance; K Wood; D L Roenker; K K Ball
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.658

5.  Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer.

Authors:  Jerri D Edwards; David E Vance; Virginia G Wadley; Gayla M Cissell; Daniel L Roenker; Karlene K Ball
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Relations between cognitive abilities and measures of executive functioning.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  A preliminary assessment of the medical and functional factors associated with vehicle crashes by older adults.

Authors:  R V Sims; C Owsley; R M Allman; K Ball; T M Smoot
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  Early visual perception.

Authors:  B Julesz; R A Schumer
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Simulated car crashes and crash predictors in drivers with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  M Rizzo; S Reinach; D McGehee; J Dawson
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1997-05

10.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults.

Authors:  C Owsley; K Ball; G McGwin; M E Sloane; D L Roenker; M F White; E T Overley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Neurocognitive enhancement or impairment? A systematic meta-analysis of prescription stimulant effects on processing speed, decision-making, planning, and cognitive perseveration.

Authors:  Marisa E Marraccini; Lisa L Weyandt; Joseph S Rossi; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Cognitive speed of processing training in older adults with visual impairments.

Authors:  Amanda F Elliott; Melissa L O'Connor; Jerri D Edwards
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A neuropsychological instrument measuring age-related cerebral decline in older drivers: development, reliability, and validity of MedDrive.

Authors:  Paul Vaucher; Isabel Cardoso; Janet L Veldstra; Daniela Herzig; Michael Herzog; Patrice Mangin; Bernard Favrat
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effects of a Lutein and Zeaxanthin Intervention on Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Younger Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Lisa M Renzi-Hammond; Emily R Bovier; Laura M Fletcher; L Stephen Miller; Catherine M Mewborn; Cutter A Lindbergh; Jeffrey H Baxter; Billy R Hammond
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Spatiotemporal Characteristics of 360-Degree Basic Attention.

Authors:  Yuki Harada; Junji Ohyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology.

Authors:  Laura Mena-Garcia; Miguel J Maldonado-Lopez; Itziar Fernandez; Maria B Coco-Martin; Jaime Finat-Saez; Jose L Martinez-Jimenez; Jose C Pastor-Jimeno; Juan F Arenillas
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Detection of scene-relative object movement and optic flow parsing across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Lucy Evans; Rebecca A Champion; Simon K Rushton; Daniela Montaldi; Paul A Warren
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Multitasking Compensatory Saccadic Training Program for Hemianopia Patients: A New Approach With 3-Dimensional Real-World Objects.

Authors:  Laura Mena-Garcia; Jose C Pastor-Jimeno; Miguel J Maldonado; Maria B Coco-Martin; Itziar Fernandez; Juan F Arenillas
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Gains following perceptual learning are closely linked to the initial visual acuity.

Authors:  Oren Yehezkel; Anna Sterkin; Maria Lev; Dennis M Levi; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups.

Authors:  Jesse Michaels; Romain Chaumillon; David Nguyen-Tri; Donald Watanabe; Pierro Hirsch; Francois Bellavance; Guillaume Giraudet; Delphine Bernardin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.