Literature DB >> 8759445

Face recognition under varying poses: the role of texture and shape.

N F Troje1, H H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Although remarkably robust, face recognition is not perfectly invariant to pose and viewpoint changes. It has long been known that both profile and full-face views result in poorer recognition performance than a 3/4 view. However, little data exist which investigate this phenomenon in detail. The present work provides such data using a high angular resolution and a large range of poses. Since there are inconsistencies in the literature concerning these issues, we emphasize the different roles of the learning view and the testing view in the recognition experiment. We also emphasize the roles of information contained in the texture and in the shape of a face. Our stimuli were generated from laser-scanned head models and contained either the natural texture or only Lambertian shading and no texture. The results of our same/different face recognition experiments are: (1) only the learning view but not the testing view affects recognition performance. (2) For textured faces the optimal learning view is closer to the full-face view than for the shaded faces. (3) For shaded faces, we find a significantly better recognition performance for the symmetric view. The results can be interpreted in terms of different strategies to recover invariants from texture and from shading.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8759445     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00230-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  73 in total

1.  Effects of temporal association on recognition memory.

Authors:  G Wallis; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Decoding simulated neurodynamics predicts the perceptual consequences of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Jianing V Shi; Jim Wielaard; R Theodore Smith; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Kohei Nonose; Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-21

4.  The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations.

Authors:  Thomas A Busey; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

5.  No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints.

Authors:  Arno Koning; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-10-07

6.  A search advantage for faces learned in motion.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition.

Authors:  Sarah J Casey; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Turning the other cheek: the viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects.

Authors:  Christopher P Benton; Peter J Etchells; Gillian Porter; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak; Stavri G Nikolov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.