Literature DB >> 10938032

The increasing use of peripheral bone densitometry.

T Masud, R M Francis.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10938032      PMCID: PMC1127781          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Lifetime fracture risk: an approach to hip fracture risk assessment based on bone mineral density and age.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; H W Wahner; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

3.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; A M Schott; J L Sebert; C Cormier; P O Kotzki; P D Delmas; J M Pouilles; G Breart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D C Bauer; C C Glüer; J A Cauley; T M Vogt; K E Ensrud; H K Genant; D M Black
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-24

5.  Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; L Maitland-Ramsey; E Myers
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults.

Authors:  A C Looker; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M S Calvo; T B Harris; S P Heyse; C C Johnston; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

9.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; E von Stetten; P Miller
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The challenges of peripheral bone density testing: which patients need additional central density skeletal measurements?

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C C Johnston; M Kleerekoper; R L Lindsay; L M Sherwood; E S Siris
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  5 in total

1.  Osteoporosis is a risk factor, not a disease.

Authors:  K E Pearce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

2.  Bone fragility and imaging techniques.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Elia; Giuseppe Caracchini; Loredana Cavalli; Paolo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

3.  Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel: the importance of side in clinical practice.

Authors:  Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Eirini Babaroutsi; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data for the Greek population.

Authors:  Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Eirini Babaroutsi; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Is calcaneal quantitative ultrasound useful as a prescreen stratification tool for osteoporosis?

Authors:  K Thomsen; D B Jepsen; L Matzen; A P Hermann; T Masud; J Ryg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.