Literature DB >> 8756840

Investigation of fecal incontinence with endoanal ultrasound.

N A Rieger1, J L Sweeney, D C Hoffmann, J F Young, A Hunter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to audit the results of endoanal ultrasound in patients with fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Endoanal ultrasound was used to investigate 53 patients with fecal incontinence. Data for endoanal ultrasound were collected prospectively. Results were compared with clinical and obstetric history, obtained retrospectively from case notes, and were compared with manometric and operative findings.
RESULTS: Sphincter abnormalities were identified in 42 of 53 patients. A total of 28 anterior defects were thought to be obstetric in origin. Fourteen other defects were secondary to anal pathology or surgery. Patients with anterior external sphincter defects either had complete defects (4 patients; mean age, 31 years) or proximal defects (24 patients; mean age, 55 years). For patients with a proximal defect, 38 percent gave a history of obstetric tear, episiotomy, or forceps delivery, and the rest declared having had an apparently normal delivery. Only 50 percent had a sphincter weakness that was evident on clinical examination. Of those studied with manometry, only 21 percent had low squeeze pressures consistent with an external sphincter defect.
CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter defects seen on ultrasound may not have a history of obstetric trauma or abnormal clinical and manometric findings. Endoanal ultrasound is recommended in all patients with fecal incontinence to detect occult sphincter defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8756840     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Lamah; D Kumar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?

Authors:  Massarat Zutshi; Levilester Salcedo; Jeffrey Hammel; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Endoanal ultrasound compared to anorectal manometry for the evaluation of fecal incontinence: a study of the effect these tests have on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Keri Hill; Shane Fanning; M Brian Fennerty; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  [Effectiveness of liberal vs. conservative episiotomy in vaginal delivery with reference to preventing urinary and fecal incontinence: a systematic review].

Authors:  Gabriele Schlömer; Mechthild Gross; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

5.  The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Nick A Heywood; James S Pearson; James E Nicholson; Clare Molyneux; Abhiram Sharma; Edward S Kiff; Peter J Whorwell; Karen J Telford
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.409

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.