Nick A Heywood1, James S Pearson2, James E Nicholson3, Clare Molyneux2, Abhiram Sharma2, Edward S Kiff2, Peter J Whorwell4, Karen J Telford2. 1. Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, 2nd Floor Acute Block, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, M23 9LT, UK. 2. University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK. 3. Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK. 4. University Hospital of South Manchester & Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes. RESULTS: Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30-82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.
BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes. RESULTS: Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30-82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.
Authors: T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: M Queralto; G Portier; P H Cabarrot; G Bonnaud; J P Chotard; M Nadrigny; F Lazorthes Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Vera Vandoninck; Michael R van Balken; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Filomena Petta; Francesco Micali; John P F A Heesakkers; Frans M J Debruyne; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Bart L H Bemelmans Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: E V Carrington; A Brokjaer; H Craven; N Zarate; E J Horrocks; S Palit; W Jackson; G S Duthie; C H Knowles; P J Lunniss; S M Scott Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Yoav Mazor; Gillian M Prott; Carol Sequeira; Michael Jones; Anastasia Ejova; John E Kellow; Margaret Schnitzler; Allison Malcolm Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.409