Literature DB >> 8753702

Scaffold attachment regions in centromere-associated DNA.

P L Strissel1, R Espinosa, J D Rowley, H Swift.   

Abstract

Due to indications that kinetochore proteins are an integral part of the protein scaffold component of the chromosome (Earnshaw et al. 1984), we chose to map the distribution of scaffold attachment regions (SARs) at centromeres. Using the SAR mapping assay of Mirkovitch et al., Southern blots were prepared and probed with 32P-labeled fragments from the human 1.9 kb centromeric alpha-satellite repeat unit of chromosome 1 or the 1.7 kb centromeric alpha-satellite repeat unit of chromosome 16. Our results demonstrated the presence of one SAR site per 1.9 kb repeat unit in chromosome 1, and every 1.7 kb repeat unit in chromosome 16, separated by regions of small DNA loops over the length of the alpha-satellite regions. We also identified several in vitro vertebrate topoisomerase II and cenP-B consensus sequences throughout the chromosome 1 alpha-satellite region using computer and base ratio analysis, to address the question as to why some alpha-satellite regions are SAR related and others are not. To provide in situ indications of SAR localization in the human genome, SAR DNA and non-SAR DNA were prepared following lithium 3,5-di-iodosalicylate extraction. Sequences protected from DNAse I digestion by SAR proteins, as compared with unprotected DNA that was digested by the enzyme, was labeled with biotin-UTP, hybridized to chromosomal DNA in situ, and then detected with fluorescein-avidin-DCS. Both SAR and non-SAR DNA selectively labeled virtually all centromeric regions of the human metaphase karyotype. Chromosomal arms were less strongly bound by SAR DNA, with a pattern that followed the chromosomal axis. In the more condensed chromosomes an R-banding pattern was evident. In general, labeling patterns produced by both SAR and non-SAR fractions were similar, as expected from the indications that SAR DNAs are heterogenous in sequence and do not form a specific class of sequences. We conclude that centromeric regions of several, possibly all, human metaphase chromosomes are also regions where the chromosomal axis contains loops, smaller in size than in the arms and where attachment sites are concentrated. This clustering of SARs may be responsible in part for the tight chromatin packing associated with the primary constriction of the centromeric region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8753702     DOI: 10.1007/bf02509522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  48 in total

1.  Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA.

Authors:  E M Southern
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A non-curved chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment site is 3' followed by a strongly curved DNA sequence.

Authors:  J P von Kries; L Phi-Van; S Diekmann; W H Strätling
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Metaphase chromosome structure: bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold.

Authors:  Y Saitoh; U K Laemmli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Protein:DNA interactions at chromosomal loop attachment sites.

Authors:  V C Blasquez; A O Sperry; P N Cockerill; W T Garrard
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  Chromatin domain surrounding the human interferon-beta gene as defined by scaffold-attached regions.

Authors:  J Bode; K Maass
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-06-28       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites.

Authors:  P N Cockerill; W T Garrard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A developmental-specific factor binds to suppressor sites flanking the immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer.

Authors:  R H Scheuermann; U Chen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Chromosome-specific alpha satellite DNA from human chromosome 1: hierarchical structure and genomic organization of a polymorphic domain spanning several hundred kilobase pairs of centromeric DNA.

Authors:  J S Waye; S J Durfy; D Pinkel; S Kenwrick; M Patterson; K E Davies; H F Willard
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 9.  The nucleoskeleton: artefact, passive framework or active site?

Authors:  P R Cook
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain.

Authors:  P V Loc; W H Strätling
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  15 in total

1.  Conserved characteristics of heterochromatin-forming DNA at the 15q11-q13 imprinting center.

Authors:  J M Greally; T A Gray; J M Gabriel; L Song; S Zemel; R D Nicholls
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chicken MAR-binding protein ARBP is homologous to rat methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2.

Authors:  J M Weitzel; H Buhrmester; W H Strätling
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Centromeres, kinetochores and the segregation of chromosomes. Foreword.

Authors:  Christine J Farr
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 4.  Databases, models, and algorithms for functional genomics: a bioinformatics perspective.

Authors:  Gautam B Singh; Harkirat Singh
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 5.  Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Owen J Marshall; Anderly C Chueh; Lee H Wong; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Fission yeast homologs of human CENP-B have redundant functions affecting cell growth and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  M Baum; L Clarke
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Common chromatin structures at breakpoint cluster regions may lead to chromosomal translocations found in chronic and acute leukemias.

Authors:  Reiner Strick; Yanming Zhang; Neelmini Emmanuel; Pamela L Strissel
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  The type of DNA attachment sites recovered from nuclear matrix depends on isolation procedure used.

Authors:  R M Donev
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  A rapid method of genomic array analysis of scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) identifies a 2.5-Mb region of enhanced scaffold/matrix attachment at a human neocentromere.

Authors:  Huseyin Sumer; Jeffrey M Craig; Mandy Sibson; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Three-dimensional localization of CENP-A suggests a complex higher order structure of centromeric chromatin.

Authors:  Owen J Marshall; Alan T Marshall; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.