Literature DB >> 8751064

A metric for assessing acuity in positioning joints and limbs.

F J Clark1, K J Larwood, M E Davis, K A Deffenbacher.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method for assessing the exactness of sensing and setting the positions of joints and limbs, using a measure we call target resolution. Target resolution, derived from information theory but ultimately based on variance, estimates the fewest number of discrete, equally spaced targets required within a range to provide the maximum possible information transfer from any target set. We argue that target resolution provides better insight into the exactness of position sense than does the usual measure of accuracy based on mean or constant error. Studies have shown that measures of mean error in setting or indicating positions of joints or limbs exhibit lability; they drift and show considerable sensitivity to factors such as previous positions of the limb and learning. We derive the equation for calculating target resolution and give example resolutions for several joints we have tested. Target resolution often gives a quite different impression of proprioceptive exactness than do measures of accuracy based on mean error.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8751064     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Does limb proprioception drift?

Authors:  J P Wann; S F Ibrahim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The amount of information in absolute judgements.

Authors:  W R GARNER; H W HAKE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Differential errors of kinesthesis produced by previous limb positions.

Authors:  B Craske; M Crawshaw
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli.

Authors:  J S Lim; W M Rabinowtiz; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds.

Authors:  L A Jones
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Muscular and joint-receptor components in postural persistence.

Authors:  I P Howard; T Anstis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-07

8.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The information transmitted at final position in visually triggered forearm movements.

Authors:  B Sakitt; F Lestienne; T A Zeffiro
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  16 in total

1.  Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry.

Authors:  Denise Y P Henriques; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Guillaume Michaud; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Functional multijoint position reproduction acuity in overhead-throwing athletes.

Authors:  Brady L Tripp; Timothy L Uhl; Carl G Mattacola; Cidambi Srinivasan; Robert Shapiro
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparing limb proprioception and oculomotor signals during hand-guided saccades.

Authors:  L Ren; G Blohm; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Joint position sense during a reaching task improves at targets located closer to the head but is unaffected by instruction.

Authors:  Jacqlyn King; Andrew Karduna
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Position sense asymmetry.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks.

Authors:  Christina T Fuentes; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Acute muscle stretching and shoulder position sense.

Authors:  Martin Björklund; Mats Djupsjöbacka; Albert G Crenshaw
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Contributions of skin and muscle afferent input to movement sense in the human hand.

Authors:  Paul J Cordo; Jean-Louis Horn; Daniela Künster; Anne Cherry; Alex Bratt; Victor Gurfinkel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The influence of external loads on movement precision during active shoulder internal rotation movements as measured by 3 indices of accuracy.

Authors:  Timothy J Brindle; Timothy L Uhl; Arthur J Nitz; Robert Shapiro
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.