Literature DB >> 2602094

Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds.

L A Jones1.   

Abstract

A contralateral limb-matching procedure was used to study the perception of forces generated by the elbow flexor muscles. Subjects were required to generate forces ranging from 15 to 85% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC range: 169-482 N), and after achieving the target force to produce a force of the same perceived intensity with their contralateral arm. Under these conditions, subjects consistently overestimated the amplitude of the two lowest forces, and the most accurate matching of forces occurred in the middle of the response range (around 50% MVC). This pattern of constant errors could be explained in terms of an artifact of the starting position, which has been shown to influence the accuracy of judgements of stimulus magnitude. The Weber fraction for force calculated from the matching data was 0.07, which is within the range reported previously for weight. These thresholds are, however, considerably lower than those described for friction and the moment of inertia, the perception of which also involves the proprioceptive system.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2602094     DOI: 10.1068/p180681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  23 in total

1.  Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reliability of Joint Position Sense and Force-Reproduction Measures During Internal and External Rotation of the Shoulder.

Authors:  Geoffrey Dover; Michael E. Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Differential thresholds for limb movement measured using adaptive techniques.

Authors:  L A Jones; I W Hunter; R J Irwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

Review 4.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta Klatzky; Randy Lee; Vikas Shivaprabhu; John Galeotti; Mel Siegel; Joel S Schuman; Ralph Hollis; George Stetten
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones; Erin Piateski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor adaptation to a small force field superimposed on a large background force.

Authors:  Jiayin Liu; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perception of finger forces within the hand after index finger fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  Woo-Hyung Park; Charles T Leonard; Sheng Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Postural control at the human wrist.

Authors:  John Z Z Chew; Simon C Gandevia; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion.

Authors:  X D Pang; H Z Tan; N I Durlach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.