Literature DB >> 8748295

Comparison of spiral gradient endpoint and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: a multilaboratory collaborative evaluation.

H M Wexler1, E Molitoris, P R Murray, J Washington, R J Zabransky, P H Edelstein, S M Finegold.   

Abstract

A multilaboratory collaborative study was carried out to assess the utility of the spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) method for the determination of the antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobes and to evaluate the equivalence of the MICs obtained by the SGE method with those obtained by the reference agar dilution method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The standard deviation of the MIC obtained by the SGE method for the five participating laboratories was +/- 0.26 of a twofold dilution, whereas it was +/- 1 twofold dilution by the reference method. The interlaboratory reproducibility of the results for two control strains tested with imipenem, chloramphenicol, and metronidazole indicated that 96% of the measurements fell within +/- 1 twofold dilution of the mode. The equivalence of the SGE method with the agar dilution method was assessed with a wide variety of anaerobic organisms. The MICs by both methods were within 1 doubling dilution in 93% of the measurements (n = 1,074). Discrepancies generally occurred with those organism-drug combinations that resulted in tailing endpoints (Fusobacterium nucleatum, 86% agreement) or in cases of light growth (Peptostreptococcus spp., 86% agreement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8748295      PMCID: PMC228752          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.170-174.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of the effects of trial, reader, and replicates on MIC determination for cefoxitin.

Authors:  H M Wexler; P T Lavin; E Molitoris; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: myth, magic, or method?

Authors:  H M Wexler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Comparison of spiral gradient and conventional agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; E Molitoris; F Jashnian; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Development and evaluation of the spiral gradient endpoint method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  G B Hill; S Schalkowsky
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Cell-wall-defective variants of Fusobacterium.

Authors:  C C Johnson; H M Wexler; S Becker; M Garcia; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antimicrobial resistance in Bacteroides.

Authors:  H M Wexler; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Spiral plate count method for the examination of raw and pasteurized milk.

Authors:  C B Donnelly; J E Gilchrist; J T Peeler; J E Campbell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D M Citron; M I Ostovari; A Karlsson; E J Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bilophila wadsworthia by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride to facilitate endpoint determination.

Authors:  P Summanen; H M Wexler; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Itzhak Brook; Hannah M Wexler; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  In vitro activities of doripenem and comparator agents against 364 anaerobic clinical isolates.

Authors:  Hannah M Wexler; Adrian E Engel; Daniel Glass; Calida Li
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Gram-positive anaerobic cocci.

Authors:  D A Murdoch
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Effects of quaternary-ammonium-based formulations on bacterial community dynamics and antimicrobial susceptibility.

Authors:  Andrew J McBain; Ruth G Ledder; Louise E Moore; Carl E Catrenich; Peter Gilbert
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Exposure of sink drain microcosms to triclosan: population dynamics and antimicrobial susceptibility.

Authors:  Andrew J McBain; Robert G Bartolo; Carl E Catrenich; Duane Charbonneau; Ruth G Ledder; Bradford B Price; Peter Gilbert
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Cervicofacial Actinomyces Infections: An Overview.

Authors:  Márió Gajdács; Edit Urbán; Gabriella Terhes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-01

Review 7.  Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Rubik's Cube of Clinical Microbiology?

Authors:  Márió Gajdács; Gabriella Spengler; Edit Urbán
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.