Literature DB >> 8747813

Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: effects on measures of phonatory stability.

M P Gelfer1.   

Abstract

Measures of phonatory stability such as jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are increasingly used in clinics and laboratories, yet questions about the effects of various aspects of voice production on these acoustic variables have received only limited attention. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of frequency, intensity, and vowel selection on those measures of phonatory stability. Twenty-nine young adult females were used as subjects. Each subject produced vocalizations at her speaking fundamental frequency (SFF) and one octave above SFF; at 60, 70, and 80 dB; and on the vowels /i/ and /a/, for a total of 12 vocalizations per subject. These vocalizations were then analyzed, using CSpeech acoustic analysis software, to obtain measures of jitter, shimmer, and SNR. Results revealed that frequency, intensity, and vowel selection all affected various phonatory stability measures, with the highest perturbation values almost always occurring in the low frequency-low intensity condition. Implications and physiological explanations for the results of the study were presented.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8747813     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3806.1189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  10 in total

1.  Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures.

Authors:  Jeff Berry; Maura Moyle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of segment selection on acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Choi; Jiyeoun Lee; Alicia J Sprecher; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.

Authors:  M Brockmann-Bauser; J E Bohlender; D D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for patients with Parkinson's disease: a 2 year follow up.

Authors:  L O Ramig; S Sapir; S Countryman; A A Pawlas; C O'Brien; M Hoehn; L L Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  The Impact of Communication Modality on Voice Production.

Authors:  Lauren F Tracy; Roxanne K Segina; Manuel Diaz Cadiz; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Objective acoustic analysis of voice improvement after phonosurgery.

Authors:  Piyush Verma; Manisha Pal; Anoop Raj
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09-24

7.  Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Jarrad H Van Stan; Marilia Carvalho Sampaio; Joerg E Bohlender; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  A Nonrandomized Trial for Student Teachers of an In-Person and Telepractice Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model With Estill Voice Training Assessed by the VoiceEvalU8 App.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Probability-Based Best Sample Selection for Acoustic Analysis of Normal and Disordered Voices.

Authors:  Boquan Liu; Jacob F Reiss; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Multidimensional effects of voice therapy in patients affected by unilateral vocal fold paralysis due to cancer.

Authors:  Camila Barbosa Barcelos; Paula Angélica Lorenzon Silveira; Renata Lígia Vieira Guedes; Aline Nogueira Gonçalves; Luciana Dall'Agnol Siqueira Slobodticov; Elisabete Carrara-de Angelis
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.