Literature DB >> 33524262

A Nonrandomized Trial for Student Teachers of an In-Person and Telepractice Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model With Estill Voice Training Assessed by the VoiceEvalU8 App.

Elizabeth U Grillo1.   

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the effects of the in-person and telepractice Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) treatment conditions and a control condition with vocally healthy student teachers. Method In this single-blinded, nonrandomized trial, 82 participants completed all aspects of the study. Estill Voice Training was used as the stimulability component of the GVPTM to train multiple new voices meeting all the vocal needs of the student teachers. Outcomes were assessed using acoustic, perceptual, and aerodynamic measures captured by the VoiceEvalU8 app at pre and post in fall and during student teaching in spring. Results Significant improvements were achieved for several acoustic and perceptual measures in the treatment conditions, but not in the control condition. The in-person and telepractice conditions produced similar results. The all-voiced phrase and connected speech were more successful in demonstrating voice change for some of the perturbation measures as compared to sustained /a/. Conclusions The treatment conditions were successful in improving the participants' voices for fundamental frequency and some acoustic perturbation measures while maintaining the improvements during student teaching. In addition, the treatment conditions were successful in decreasing the negative impact of voice-related quality of life and vocal fatigue during student teaching. Future research should address the effectiveness of the various components of the GVPTM, the application of the GVPTM with patients with voice disorders, the relevance of defining auditory-perceptual terms by the anatomy and physiology of the voice production system (i.e., Estill Voice Training), and the continued use of the VoiceEvalU8 app for clinical voice investigations. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13626824.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33524262      PMCID: PMC8740681          DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  73 in total

1.  The effect of a short voice training program in future teachers.

Authors:  Bernadette Timmermans; Yannick Coveliers; Wil Meeus; Frits Vandenabeele; Linda Van Looy; Floris Wuyts
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Real-time estimation of aerodynamic features for ambulatory voice biofeedback.

Authors:  Andrés F Llico; Matías Zañartu; Agustín J González; George R Wodicka; Daryush D Mehta; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Delivery of Intensive Voice Therapy for Vocal Fold Nodules Via Telepractice: A Pilot Feasibility and Efficacy Study.

Authors:  Sherry Fu; Deborah G Theodoros; Elizabeth C Ward
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Carolyn R Baylor
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 5.  Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again?

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Michael J Drinnan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: effects on measures of phonatory stability.

Authors:  M P Gelfer
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-12

7.  Effects of practice schedules on speech motor learning.

Authors:  Andus W-K Wong; Tara L Whitehill; Estella P-M Ma; Rich Masters
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.484

8.  Occupational risk factors associated with voice disorders among teachers.

Authors:  Susan L Thibeault; Ray M Merrill; Nelson Roy; Steven D Gray; Elaine M Smith
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices.

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Susan Thibeault; Steven D Gray; Elaine M Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Jeremy Wolfberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.300

View more
  3 in total

1.  Normative Values of Client-Reported Outcome Measures and Self-Ratings of Six Voice Parameters via the VoiceEvalU8 App.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Brigit Corej; Jeremy Wolfberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Functional Voice Assessment and Therapy Methods Supported by Telepractice, VoiceEvalU8, and Estill Voice Training.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.761

3.  An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Jeremy Wolfberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.300

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.