Literature DB >> 87459

Suppressor cells for the afferent phase of contact sensitivity to picryl chloride: inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by T cells from mice injected with picryl sulfonic acid.

W R Thomas, M C Watkins, G L Asherson.   

Abstract

Previous reports have shown that picryl sulfonic acid (PSA) induces suppressor T cells that inhibit the effector phase of contact sensitivity, whereeas its DNP counterpart, dinitrobenzenesulfonate (DNBS) induces cells that inhibit the afferent phase of sensitization. Accordingly, cells from mice injected with DNBS, but not PSA, could be shown to inhibit the DNA synthesis in the lymph nodes that occurs during sensitization. It is now shown that PSA does induce T cells that suppress DNA synthesis but this can only be detected with enriched T cells or by using a regimen of PSA injection different frm previously used to induce suppressor cells for the effector phase. The T cells did not affect responses to oxazolone or dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and were distinguishable from suppressors of the efferent phase in that they could be produced in adult thymectomized but not cyclophosphamide-treated mice. T cells from mice injected with DNBS that inhibited DNA synthesis to DNFB had the same properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 87459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  9 in total

1.  Suppression of lymphoproliferation by hapten-specific suppressor T lymphocytes from mice exposed to ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  S E Ullrich
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  The control of the contact sensitivity skin reaction: T-suppressor afferent cell blocks the production of antigen-specific T-helper factor.

Authors:  G L Asherson; V Colizzi; B M James
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Regulation of lymphocyte proliferation in contact sensitivity: homeostatic mechanisms and a possible explanation of antigenic competition.

Authors:  I Kimber; C J Shepherd; J A Mitchell; J L Turk; D Baker
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Differential inhibition of contact sensitivity by suppressor T cells and suppressor factor induced by combined treatment with dinitrobenzenesulphonate and dinitrofluorobenzene.

Authors:  C Zimber; S Ben-Efraim; D W Weiss
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.

Authors:  Y Ikarashi; T Tsuchiya; A Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Differences in the ability of T cells to suppress the induction and expression of contact sensitivity.

Authors:  W R Thomas; M C Watkins; G L Asherson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  T suppressor cells and suppressor factor which act at the efferent stage of the contact sensitivity skin reaction: their production by mice injected with water-soluble, chemically reactive derivatives of oxazolone and picryl chloride.

Authors:  G L Asherson; M Zembala
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  Suppression of T cells specific for the nonthymic parental H-2 haplotype in thymus-grafted chimeras.

Authors:  F I Smith; J F Miller
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1980-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Dichotomy between the induction of suppressor cells and immunologic tolerance by adult thymectomy.

Authors:  Y Borel; L Kilham; S E Kurtz; C L Reinisch
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1980-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.