Michelle E Olah1, Gregory Gaisano, Stephen W Hwang. 1. Centre for Research on Inner City Health, the Keenan Research Centre at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health care office staff and providers may discriminate against people of low socioeconomic status, even in the absence of economic incentives to do so. We sought to determine whether socioeconomic status affects the response a patient receives when seeking a primary care appointment. METHODS: In a single unannounced telephone call to a random sample of family physicians and general practices (n = 375) in Toronto, Ontario, a male and a female researcher each played the role of a patient seeking a primary care physician. Callers followed a script suggesting either high (i.e., bank employee transferred to the city) or low (i.e., recipient of social assistance) socioeconomic status, and either the presence or absence of chronic health conditions (diabetes and low back pain). We randomized the characteristics of the caller for each office. Our primary outcome was whether the caller was offered an appointment. RESULTS: The proportion of calls resulting in an appointment being offered was significantly higher when the callers presented themselves as having high socioeconomic status than when they presented as having low socioeconomic status (22.6% v.14.3%, p = 0.04) and when the callers stated the presence of chronic health conditions than when they did not (23.5% v. 12.8%, p = 0.008). In a model adjusted for all independent variables significant at a p value of 0.10 or less (presence of chronic health conditions, time since graduation from medical school and membership in the College of Family Physicians of Canada), high socioeconomic status was associated with an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.08) for the offer of an appointment. Socioeconomic status and chronic health conditions had independent effects on the likelihood of obtaining an appointment. INTERPRETATION: Within a universal health insurance system in which physician reimbursement is unaffected by patients' socioeconomic status, people presenting themselves as having high socioeconomic status received preferential access to primary care over those presenting themselves as having low socioeconomic status.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Health care office staff and providers may discriminate against people of low socioeconomic status, even in the absence of economic incentives to do so. We sought to determine whether socioeconomic status affects the response a patient receives when seeking a primary care appointment. METHODS: In a single unannounced telephone call to a random sample of family physicians and general practices (n = 375) in Toronto, Ontario, a male and a female researcher each played the role of a patient seeking a primary care physician. Callers followed a script suggesting either high (i.e., bank employee transferred to the city) or low (i.e., recipient of social assistance) socioeconomic status, and either the presence or absence of chronic health conditions (diabetes and low back pain). We randomized the characteristics of the caller for each office. Our primary outcome was whether the caller was offered an appointment. RESULTS: The proportion of calls resulting in an appointment being offered was significantly higher when the callers presented themselves as having high socioeconomic status than when they presented as having low socioeconomic status (22.6% v.14.3%, p = 0.04) and when the callers stated the presence of chronic health conditions than when they did not (23.5% v. 12.8%, p = 0.008). In a model adjusted for all independent variables significant at a p value of 0.10 or less (presence of chronic health conditions, time since graduation from medical school and membership in the College of Family Physicians of Canada), high socioeconomic status was associated with an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.08) for the offer of an appointment. Socioeconomic status and chronic health conditions had independent effects on the likelihood of obtaining an appointment. INTERPRETATION: Within a universal health insurance system in which physician reimbursement is unaffected by patients' socioeconomic status, people presenting themselves as having high socioeconomic status received preferential access to primary care over those presenting themselves as having low socioeconomic status.
Authors: Adil H Haider; Janel Sexton; N Sriram; Lisa A Cooper; David T Efron; Sandra Swoboda; Cassandra V Villegas; Elliott R Haut; Morgan Bonds; Peter J Pronovost; Pamela A Lipsett; Julie A Freischlag; Edward E Cornwell Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Vickie L Shavers; Pebbles Fagan; Dionne Jones; William M P Klein; Josephine Boyington; Carmen Moten; Edward Rorie Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: D A Leiman; B Kochar; S Posner; C Fan; A Patel; O Shaheen; C Y Keller; N T Koutlas; S Eluri; E S Dellon Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Brendan M Patterson; Reid W Draeger; Erik C Olsson; Jeffrey T Spang; Feng-Chang Lin; Ganesh V Kamath Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Satvinder Kaur; Hip Seng Yim; Rohana Abdul Jalil; Barakatun-Nisak Mohd-Yusof; Hamid Jan Jan Mohamed Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2018-12