Literature DB >> 8443892

Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry.

S F Kelsey1, M James, A L Holubkov, R Holubkov, M J Cowley, K M Detre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) 1978-1981 Registry cohort indicated that PTCA risk was higher and efficacy was lower in women. Data from the 1985-1986 PTCA Registry are used to address the question of whether compared with men, women still have a worse outcome after PTCA. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The 1985-1986 NHLBI PTCA Registry collected data on consecutive, first-PTCA cases at 16 centers. Initial results are reported for 2,136 patients, 546 of whom were women. Four-year follow-up status was available on 95% of the cohort. Although women were an average of 4.5 years older than the male patients and had more cardiovascular risk factors and more severe angina, their coronary artery disease as assessed by angiography was not more extensive. Rates of angiographic success on a per-lesion basis were similar for women and men (89% versus 88%), and the clinical success rates (79%) were the same. Women had more initial complications (29% versus 20%, p < 0.001) and a considerably higher procedural mortality rate (2.6% versus 0.3%, p < 0.001). For patients who survived the initial procedure, 4-year survival was similar for men and women. At 4 years, women had slightly fewer events (myocardial infarction, repeat PTCA, and/or coronary artery bypass grafting). Despite the higher proportion of women reporting the presence of angina and medication use at 4 years, the proportion reporting improvement in symptomatic status was similar to that of men.
CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing PTCA have a higher procedural mortality risk than men; this is explained in part by their worse cardiovascular risk factor profile. Otherwise, the success rate and long-term prognosis after PTCA are excellent, and PTCA should be considered for women in need of revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8443892     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.3.720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  31 in total

1.  Proceedings from the scientific symposium: Sex differences in cardiovascular disease and implications for therapies.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Saralyn Mark; Barbara D Boyan; Alice K Jacobs; Prediman K Shah; Leslee J Shaw; Doris Taylor; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  Ghada W Mikhail
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-03

Review 3.  The Influence of Sex on Cardiac Physiology and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Bin Liu; Ranzun Zhao; Saidan Zhang; Xi-Yong Yu; Yangxin Li
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Vascular Access-Related Complications in Women: Temporal Trends, Emerging Data, and the Current State of Interventional Cardiology Practice.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; Rushi V Parikh; Jennifer A Tremmel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Age.

Authors:  Kelly C Epps; Elizabeth M Holper; Faith Selzer; Helen A Vlachos; Sarah K Gualano; J Dawn Abbott; Alice K Jacobs; Oscar C Marroquin; Srihari S Naidu; Peter W Groeneveld; Robert L Wilensky
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-02

6.  Impact of gender difference on long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease in patients under statin treatment.

Authors:  Hideki Wada; Manabu Ogita; Katsumi Miyauchi; Jun Shitara; Hirohisa Endo; Shinichiro Doi; Ryo Naito; Hirokazu Konishi; Shuta Tsuboi; Tomotaka Dohi; Takatoshi Kasai; Hiroshi Tamura; Shinya Okazaki; Kikuo Isoda; Satoru Suwa; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Amit K Hiteshi; Dong Li; Yanlin Gao; Andy Chen; Ferdinand Flores; Song Shou Mao; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Gender differences in the management of acute chest pain. Support for the "Yentl syndrome".

Authors:  P A Johnson; L Goldman; E J Orav; L Zhou; T Garcia; S D Pearson; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Coronary heart disease in women: a challenge for the 21st century.

Authors:  Maria Cecília Solimene
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Coronary artery disease in women.

Authors:  V Chiamvimonvat; L Sternberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.