Literature DB >> 2643135

Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT.

M D Rifkin1, S M Ehrlich, G Marks.   

Abstract

One hundred two consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for rectal cancer were examined by means of endorectal ultrasound (US) for staging before surgery. Eighty-one of these patients also underwent staging with computed tomography (CT). The diagnostic sensitivity of endorectal US in detection of tumor extension into fat was 67%; specificity, 77%; positive predictive value, 73%; and negative predictive value, 72%. The sensitivity of CT for this finding was 53%; specificity, 53%; positive predictive value, 56%; and negative predictive value, 50%. The sensitivity of endorectal US in detection of lymph node infiltration was 50%; specificity, 92%; positive predictive value, 68%; and negative predictive value, 84%. For this finding the sensitivity and negative predictive value, 76%. These findings suggest that endorectal US may be as accurate as CT, or more so, in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2643135     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.170.2.2643135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  J E Husband; R Guy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Endorectal sonography for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  D D Dershaw
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1992-07

3.  Comparison of precontrast, postcontrast, and delayed CT scanning for the staging of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  E B Skriver; M B Nielsen; S Qvitzau; J Christiansen
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

4.  Superimposition of computed tomography and single photon emission tomography immunoscintigraphic images in the pelvis: validation in patients with colorectal or ovarian carcinoma recurrence.

Authors:  J C Liehn; A Loboguerrero; C Pérault; L Demange
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

5.  Total mesorectal excision: what are we doing?

Authors:  David B Stewart; David W Dietz
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

6.  How Good Is Good Enough? Lymph Node Metastasis After Endoscopic Resection of a Rectosigmoid Polyp.

Authors:  Ian Holmes; George Triadafilopoulos; Kristin Jensen; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

8.  Feasibility of adequate resectable rectal cancer treatment in a third-level hospital.

Authors:  J Gallego-Plazas; F Menárguez-Pina; A Maestre-Peiró; V González-Orozco; F Andreu; M J Escudero-Barea; M A Morcillo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 9.  Can endoscopic ultrasound predict early rectal cancers that can be resected endoscopically? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Matthew L Bechtold; Jyotsna B K Reddy; Abhishek Choudhary; Mainor R Antillon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Multimodal preoperative evaluation system in surgical decision making for rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Donghao Lv; Huan Song; Lei Deng; Qiang Gao; Junhua Wu; Yingyu Shi; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.