Literature DB >> 8739647

Quality of final care for terminal cancer patients in a comprehensive cancer centre from the point of view of patients' families.

Y Merrouche1, G Freyer, P Saltel, P Rebattu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of care for terminal cancer patients at our institution, as assessed by families in a questionnaire sent 6 months after the death of the patient. We evaluated the quality of information given to the patients and to their families, the patients' "comfort" at the end of their lives (nursing, pain, psychological support) and the families' opinions about the practical conditions at the time of death (in our institution or at home). A total of 105 consecutive patients who died in our institution between January and June 1989 were included in the study; the vast majority had breast or head and neck cancers. We obtained a total of 48 answers from the 105 families that received the questionnaire. Of these, 87.5% were satisfied with the terminal nursing care, 77% were satisfied with the information given to patients and 60% with the information given to families. The treatment for pain was considered to be inefficient or incomplete by 21% of the families; 32 families (67%) considered that the death of terminal cancer patients should occur in the hospital where the patient had been treated and 12% felt that it should occur at home. This study led us to examine various means for improving the quality of care for our terminal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8739647     DOI: 10.1007/bf01682335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  14 in total

1.  Terminal care: home, hospital, or hospice?

Authors:  C M Parkes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The information given to the terminal patient with cancer.

Authors:  E Espinosa; M González Barón; J Poveda; A Ordóñez; P Zamora
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Social and demographic characteristics of patients admitted to a palliative care unit.

Authors:  E Bruera; N Kuehn; B Emery; K Macmillan; J Hanson
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.250

4.  Cancer by another name: a randomized trial of the effects of euphemism and uncertainty in communicating with cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Dunn; P U Patterson; P N Butow; H H Smartt; W H McCarthy; M H Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers. Perceptions of the illness experience.

Authors:  E C Clipp; L K George
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Survey of distressing symptoms in dying patients and their families in hospital and the response to a symptom control team.

Authors:  J M Hockley; R Dunlop; R J Davies
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-06-18

Review 7.  Quality of life assessment in palliative care.

Authors:  I G Finlay; R Dunlop
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Ethical dilemmas in hospice and palliative care.

Authors:  B M Kinzbrunner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Townsend; A O Frank; D Fermont; S Dyer; O Karran; A Walgrove; M Piper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-01

10.  Dehydration symptoms of palliative care cancer patients.

Authors:  F I Burge
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quality assurance in palliative care--a growing "must"?

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Measuring Experience With End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Jessica Penn Lendon; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Oluwatobi A Oluwatola; Rebecca Anhang Price; Denise Quigley; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Views of patients with gynecologic cancer about the end of life.

Authors:  Nezihe Kizilkaya Beji; Nesrin Reis; Beyhan Bag
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  "Do not tell": what factors affect relatives' attitudes to honest disclosure of diagnosis to cancer patients?

Authors:  Mustafa Ozdogan; Mustafa Samur; Hakan Sat Bozcuk; Erkan Coban; Mehmet Artac; Burhan Savas; Arzu Kara; Zekiye Topcu; Yeliz Sualp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  Erin K Kross; Ruth A Engelberg; Sarah E Shannon; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Family member satisfaction with end-of-life decision making in the ICU.

Authors:  Cynthia J Gries; J Randall Curtis; Richard J Wall; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.410

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.