Literature DB >> 1735074

Patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers. Perceptions of the illness experience.

E C Clipp1, L K George.   

Abstract

This study focuses on patterns of response between patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers to examine the reliability of spouse informants in research and clinical settings. Thirty dyads (patient with cancer-spouse caregiver couples; total n = 60) were interviewed concurrently in their homes concerning patient functioning, psychologic distress, physical symptoms, caregiver perceptions of patient functioning, and marriage quality. Couples had been married an average of 32 years. Patients had either the lung or colon as their primary cancer site, and one third had metastasis. Correlations between 14 variable pairs and cross-tabulation of scale scores suggest that spouse caregivers agree with patients on objective measures with observable referents (e.g., ability to dress independently). Partners disagree on subjective aspects of patient functioning (e.g., depression, fear of future, and confidence in treatment) and marriage quality. Almost without exception, caregivers viewed patients' functioning more negatively than patients described themselves. Patients, however, viewed marital quality more negatively than did caregivers. It was concluded that caregivers can serve as proxies for patients with cancer in research and clinical settings when objective data are sought. Data from both spouses are needed, however, to complete the picture of subjective illness experiences in patients with cancer, including perceptions of pain and disease symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1735074     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920215)69:4<1074::aid-cncr2820690440>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  22 in total

1.  Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults.

Authors:  K A Herr; L Garand
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.076

2.  Who should measure quality of life?

Authors:  J Addington-Hall; L Kalra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-09

3.  Proxy ratings of health related quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer L Steel; David A Geller; Brian I Carr
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Dyadic concordance among prostate cancer patients and their partners and health-related quality of life: does it matter?

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Vanessa L Malcarne; Celine M Ko; Melody Sadler; Lisa Kwack; James W Varni; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-11

5.  End-of-Life Experience of Older Adults Dying of End-Stage Renal Disease: A Comparison With Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Stuart R Lipsitz; Karl A Lorenz; Edward R Marcantonio; Zhonghe Li; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The effectiveness of a self-reporting bedside pain assessment tool for oncology inpatients.

Authors:  Eun Bi Kim; Hye-Suk Han; Jung Hwa Chung; Bo Ram Park; Sung-Nam Lim; Kyoung Hoon Yim; Young Duck Shin; Ki Hyeong Lee; Wun-Jae Kim; Seung Taik Kim
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Proxy and patients ratings on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Korea.

Authors:  Eun Joo Kim; Dong Ho Song; Se Joo Kim; Jin Young Park; Eun Lee; Jeong Ho Seok; Duk-In Jon; Hyun-Sang Cho
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Agreement between prostate cancer patients and their clinicians about utilities and attribute importance.

Authors:  Arthur S Elstein; Gretchen B Chapman; Joan S Chmiel; Sara J Knight; Cheeling Chan; Robert B Nadler; Timothy M Kuzel; Amy K Siston; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Confidant and breast cancer patient reports of quality of life.

Authors:  Ann K Sandgren; Amy B Mullens; Shannon C Erickson; Kathleen M Romanek; Kevin D McCaul
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.