Literature DB >> 8736017

Interobserver and intraobserver variation for analysis of left ventricular wall motion at baseline and during low- and high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with high prevalence of wall motion abnormalities at rest.

K Bjørnstad1, M al Amri, J Lingamanaicker, I Oqaili, L Hatle.   

Abstract

Interobserver and intraobserver variation for analysis of left ventricular regional wall motion during dobutamine stress echocardiography was assessed. Computer-displayed cineloops from 33 patients, 25 with baseline wall motion abnormalities, were analyzed by two observers blinded for patient data. Assessment included (1) baseline wall motion abnormalities, (2) evidence of myocardial viability at 10 micrograms/kg/min dobutamine, and (3) evidence of myocardial ischemia at 30 to 40 micrograms/kg/min. Wall motion score index was calculated at each stage. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for baseline wall motion abnormalities was 100%. Interobserver agreement for viability and ischemia was 84% and 82%, respectively; intraobserver agreement was 92% and 85%, respectively. Mean interobserver differences in wall motion score index ranged from 0.06 +/- 0.14 at baseline to 0.09 +/- 0.20 at high doses (p < 0.05 at all levels); mean intraobserver differences ranged from 0.001 +/- 0.14 to 0.01 +/- 0.15 (difference not significant at all levels).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8736017     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(96)90147-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  8 in total

1.  Contrast agents provide a faster learning curve in dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Jose Zamorano; Violeta Sánchez; Raúl Moreno; Carlos Almería; Jose Rodrigo; Viviana Serra; Luis Azcona; Adalia Aubele; Luis Mataix; Luis Sánchez-Harguindey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  How does computer-assisted digital wall motion analysis influence observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy during stress echocardiography?

Authors:  K Bjørnstad; S Aakhus; H G Torp
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-04

3.  The diagnostic value of Doppler echocardiographic indexes of diastolic filling for detecting demand ischemia in anesthetized patients.

Authors:  M D Seeberger; M Filipovic; R Rohlfs; O Dergeloo; W Studer; D Atar; P Buser; K Skarvan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-12

Review 4.  Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Basil Al-Sabeq; Faisal Nabi; Dipan J Shah
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5.  Principles of transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Anita C Boyd; Nelson B Schiller; Liza Thomas
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Local cardiac wall stabilization influences the reproducibility of regional wall motion during off-pump coronary artery pass surgery.

Authors:  T Shiga; K Terajima; J Matsumura; A Sakamoto; R Ogawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Defining Coronary Flow Patterns: Comprehensive Automation of Transthoracic Doppler Coronary Blood Flow.

Authors:  Ian L Sunyecz; Patricia E McCallinhart; Kishan U Patel; Michael R McDermott; Aaron J Trask
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction by single echocardiographic view: towards an evidence-based point of care cardiac ultrasound scanning protocol.

Authors:  Christina Luong; Shekoofeh Saboktakin Rizi; Kenneth Gin; John Jue; Darwin F Yeung; Michael Y C Tsang; Eric C Sayre; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.316

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.