T Shiga1, K Terajima, J Matsumura, A Sakamoto, R Ogawa. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Nippon Medical School, Sendagi 1-1-5, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan. shiga/anesth@nms.ac.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Myocardial ischemia is a risk factor during off-pump coronary artery bypass procedures. The development of new regional wall motion abnormalities assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a very sensitive sign of myocardial ischemia. To facilitate anastomosis, the epicardial area of the anastomosis site is often immobilized by a "stabilizer." This study was designed to investigate whether cardiac wall stabilization with an epicardial stabilizer could affect the interpretation of wall motion during coronary anastomosis without cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: The TEE videotapes of 15 adult patients were investigated. Left ventricular (LV) transgastric short and long axis views were divided according to a modified 16-segment method. LV wall motion was scored using a 5-grade scale by two independent blinded investigators during pre-occlusion, occlusion, and reperfusion of anastomosed coronary arteries. The wall motion scores of a stabilized segment combined with two adjacent segments were compared with those of non-stabilized segments. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: A total of 216 segments were analyzed by two investigators. The interobserver kappa coefficient in pre-occlusion and reperfusion periods was 0.87, 0.87 and 0.86, 0.87, respectively, indicating high agreements without stabilizer. During the occlusion period in stabilized and non-stabilized segments, it was 0.59 and 0.76, respectively, showing significantly less reproducibility in the presence of stabilizer. CONCLUSION: Cardiac wall stabilization affects the reproducibility in the interpretation of regional wall motion during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Caution should be used when monitoring for myocardial ischemia using TEE during coronary artery bypass surgery with epicardial stabilizer.
OBJECTIVE:Myocardial ischemia is a risk factor during off-pump coronary artery bypass procedures. The development of new regional wall motion abnormalities assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a very sensitive sign of myocardial ischemia. To facilitate anastomosis, the epicardial area of the anastomosis site is often immobilized by a "stabilizer." This study was designed to investigate whether cardiac wall stabilization with an epicardial stabilizer could affect the interpretation of wall motion during coronary anastomosis without cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: The TEE videotapes of 15 adult patients were investigated. Left ventricular (LV) transgastric short and long axis views were divided according to a modified 16-segment method. LV wall motion was scored using a 5-grade scale by two independent blinded investigators during pre-occlusion, occlusion, and reperfusion of anastomosed coronary arteries. The wall motion scores of a stabilized segment combined with two adjacent segments were compared with those of non-stabilized segments. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: A total of 216 segments were analyzed by two investigators. The interobserver kappa coefficient in pre-occlusion and reperfusion periods was 0.87, 0.87 and 0.86, 0.87, respectively, indicating high agreements without stabilizer. During the occlusion period in stabilized and non-stabilized segments, it was 0.59 and 0.76, respectively, showing significantly less reproducibility in the presence of stabilizer. CONCLUSION: Cardiac wall stabilization affects the reproducibility in the interpretation of regional wall motion during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Caution should be used when monitoring for myocardial ischemia using TEE during coronary artery bypass surgery with epicardial stabilizer.
Authors: K Kotoh; G Watanabe; K Ueyama; M Uozaki; M Suzuki; T Misaki; M Wakasugi; Y Ito Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: V A Moisés; C B Mesquita; O Campos; J L Andrade; J Bocanegra; J C Andrade; E Buffolo; A C Carvalho Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: M D Seeberger; M K Cahalan; K Rouine-Rapp; E Foster; P Ionescu; M Balea; S Merrick; N B Schiller Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: R Hoffmann; H Lethen; T Marwick; M Arnese; P Fioretti; A Pingitore; E Picano; T Buck; R Erbel; F A Flachskampf; P Hanrath Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 24.094