Literature DB >> 8733945

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tolerance to morphine analgesia during infusion in rats.

D M Ouellet1, G M Pollack.   

Abstract

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was constructed to describe the kinetics of tolerance development to morphine-induced antinociception. Tail-flick latencies in response to hot water (50 degrees C) were assessed in male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to a 12-hr iv infusion of either morphine (1.4 to 3.0 mg/kg per hr) or saline. Morphine-induced antinociception, expressed as the percentage of maximum possible response (% MPR), peaked after 120 min of infusion and decreased thereafter despite sustained systemic morphine concentrations. Both the rate and extent of tolerance development increased with increasing concentrations; an overall residual effect of approximately 24% MPR was observed at the end of the infusion regardless of the steady-state morphine concentration. The kinetics of tolerance offset were examined in a separate experiment by assessing tail-flick latency 15 min after morphine iv bolus (2 mg/kg) in tolerant and control rats. Recovery of response neared completion 18.5 days after a 12-hr exposure to morphine (2.0 mg/kg per hr). A PK-PD model was constructed to account for the delay in onset of antinociceptive effect and tolerance development relative to the blood concentration-time profile. According to this model, both the extent and the rate of tolerance development were modulated by the kinetics of the drug in the central compartment. Accumulation of a hypothetical "inhibitor" acting either as a reverse agonist, a competitive or noncompetitive antagonist, or a partial agonist could potentially account for the loss of pharmacologic effect in the presence of an agonist. The rate of tolerance development predicted from the PK-PD model varied widely (28-fold) depending on the type of pharmacologic interaction selected to account for the loss of effect. Using the rate of tolerance offset to discriminate between the different models (t1/2 offset 5.4 days), onset and offset of tolerance was described accurately by postulating that the inhibitor behaves as a partial agonist with low intrinsic activity (5.5% MPR) and high binding affinity for the receptor (IC50 15.0 ng/ml).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8733945     DOI: 10.1007/bf02353460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  48 in total

Review 1.  A MOLECULAR BASIS FOR DRUG ACTION.

Authors:  E J ARIUENS; A M SIMONIS
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 3.765

2.  Affinity and intrinsic-activity in the theory of competitive- and non-competitive inhibition and an analysis of some forms of dualism in action.

Authors:  E J ARIENS; A M SIMONIS; W M DE GROOT
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1955-01-01

3.  Fast reliable assay for morphine and its metabolites using high-performance liquid chromatography and native fluorescence detection.

Authors:  R F Venn; A Michalkiewicz
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1990-02-23

4.  Morphine-3-glucuronide may functionally antagonize morphine-6-glucuronide induced antinociception and ventilatory depression in the rat.

Authors:  Gong Qian-Ling; Jan Hedner; Roland Björkman; Thomas Hedner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Mechanisms of cellular adaptive sensitivity changes: applications to opioid tolerance and dependence.

Authors:  S M Johnson; W W Fleming
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Biochemical basis for analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide. I. Penetration of morphine-6-glucuronide in the brain of rats.

Authors:  H Yoshimura; S Ida; K Oguri; H Tsukamoto
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Differential development of acute tolerance to analgesia, respiratory depression, gastrointestinal transit and hormone release in a morphine infusion model.

Authors:  G S Ling; D Paul; R Simantov; G W Pasternak
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  Benefit from and tolerance to continuous intrathecal infusion of morphine for intractable cancer pain.

Authors:  H S Greenberg; J Taren; W D Ensminger; K Doan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  High-dose morphine and methadone in cancer patients. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations of oral treatment.

Authors:  J Säwe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Time course characteristics of tolerance development to continuously infused antinociceptive agents in rat spinal cord.

Authors:  C W Stevens; T L Yaksh
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Interchangeability and predictive performance of empirical tolerance models.

Authors:  M Gårdmark; L Brynne; M Hammarlund-Udenaes; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Opioid tolerance development: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective.

Authors:  Emily O Dumas; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Effects of the TRPV1 antagonist ABT-102 on body temperature in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic analysis of three phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Ahmed A Othman; Wolfram Nothaft; Walid M Awni; Sandeep Dutta
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Modelling the cardiovascular effects of ephedrine.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; N Seth Berry; Gary M Pollack; Kim L R Brouwer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Modelling acute tolerance to the EEG effect of two benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Harald Ihmsen; Sven Albrecht; Werner Hering; Jürgen Schüttler; Helmut Schwilden
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.