Literature DB >> 8730167

Efficacy of 4 commercially available protective creams in the repetitive irritation test (RIT).

W Schlüter-Wigger1, P Elsner.   

Abstract

Protective creams (PCs) play their part in the prevention of occupational contact dermatitis, even though efficacy data are frequently lacking. 4 different commercially-available PCs were evaluated against a set of 4 standard irritants (10% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), 1% sodium hydroxide (NaOH), 30% lactic acid (LA) and undiluted toluene (TOL)) in the repetitive irritation test (RIT) in humans described by Frosch and Kurte. 20 subjects were tested on the paravertebral skin on the mid-back. Irritation was assessed by visual scoring, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as an indicator of epidermal barrier function, and colorimetry as a parameter of inflammation. Very different protective effects of the PCs on irritation by chemical substances were detectable. All products were very effective against SLS irritation. No PC provided significant protection against toluene. 3 products showed a partially protective effect against all ionic irritants, while the 4th showed less protection against SLS and NaOH, and even amplification of inflammation by TOL. Considering the range of PC effects from good protection to increased irritation, depending on the irritant, the need for careful selection of PCs for specific workplaces is stressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8730167     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02200.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  7 in total

Review 1.  Are barrier creams actually effective?

Authors:  M S Alvarez; L H Brown; R R Brancaccio
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Effectiveness of skin protection creams as a preventive measure in occupational dermatitis: a critical update according to criteria of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Birgitta Kütting; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Occupational skin-protection products--a review.

Authors:  J Kresken; A Klotz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Aleksandr Stefaniak; Fritz Eloff; Swen John; Tove Agner; Tzu-Chieh Chou; Rosemary Nixon; Markus Steiner; Anja Franken; Irena Kudla; Linn Holness
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 5.  Occupational issues of irritant contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Ai-Lean Chew; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 6.  Hygiene of the skin: when is clean too clean?

Authors:  E Larson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Diabetic and sympathetic influences on the water permeability barrier function of human skin as measured using transepidermal water loss: A case-control study.

Authors:  Seung Hoon Han; Ji Woong Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.