Literature DB >> 8726252

Quantitative microbiology in the management of burn patients. I. Correlation between quantitative and qualitative burn wound biopsy culture and surface alginate swab culture.

J A Steer1, R P Papini, A P Wilson, D A McGrouther, N Parkhouse.   

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of burn wound infection is commonly determined by clinical impression and the qualitative results of surface swabs. It has been suggested that quantitative bacteriology from burn wound biopsies confirms burn wound infection and improves patient management. Methods for quantitating surface flora have been described, but comparisons with biopsy specimens have been contradictory. The quantitative and qualitative results of 141 pairs of biopsies and surface swabs, from 74 burn patients, were compared. Staph. aureus was the commonest organism isolated (29 per cent of biopsies and 35 per cent of swabs). Recovery of the same set of species from biopsy and swab occurred in 54 per cent of pairs. There was a significant correlation between the bacterial count obtained by biopsy and by surface swab (P < 0.001), but using various threshold values, the predictive value of the counts obtained by one method to predict the counts obtained by the other was poor. Parallel cultures taken on 18 occasions, showed a significant correlation between bacterial counts obtained from two biopsies or two swabs taken simultaneously (P < 0.002), but there was wide variation in bacterial densities from the same burn wound at the same time. Recovery of the same set of species from both biopsies occurred in 56 per cent of pairs, and from both swabs in 50 per cent of pairs. The use of quantitative microbiology in burns is limited by the unreliability of a single surface swab or biopsy to represent the whole burn wound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8726252     DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00116-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  10 in total

1.  Survival of enterococci and staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic.

Authors:  A N Neely; M P Maley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Jf Arnould; R Le Floch
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 3.  Topical antimicrobials for burn infections - an update.

Authors:  Mert Sevgi; Ani Toklu; Daniela Vecchio; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients.

Authors:  Roohi Vinaik; Dalia Barayan; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 5.  Are quantitative bacterial wound cultures useful?

Authors:  George Kallstrom
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of surface swab and quantitative biopsy cultures dependent on isolated microorganisms from burn wounds.

Authors:  Mete Koray Vural; Ulku Altoparlak; Demet Celebi; Mufide Nuran Akcay
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2013-02

Review 7.  Burn wound infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Sameer Elsayed; Owen Reid; Brent Winston; Robert Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  A clinical investigation into the microbiological status of 'locally infected' leg ulcers.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper; Hanar Ameen; Patricia Price; Dorothy A McCulloch; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Bacteriology of the burn wound at the Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for children, Mumbai, India-A 13-year study, Part I-Bacteriological profile.

Authors:  Shankar Srinivasan; Arvind M Vartak; Aakanksha Patil; Jovita Saldanha
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-07

Review 10.  Bacterial Infections After Burn Injuries: Impact of Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  Anne M Lachiewicz; Christopher G Hauck; David J Weber; Bruce A Cairns; David van Duin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 9.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.