Literature DB >> 20051097

A clinical investigation into the microbiological status of 'locally infected' leg ulcers.

Rose A Cooper1, Hanar Ameen, Patricia Price, Dorothy A McCulloch, Keith G Harding.   

Abstract

The complex interactions between patients and the microbial species that reside in their wounds are not yet fully characterised. Investigations to date have dealt with either those organisms that cause infections or those that establish long-term colonisations. The objective of this open, prospective pilot study was to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the microbiological status of 'locally infected' venous leg ulcers. Three different sampling techniques were used to recover organisms from 20 venous leg ulcers that had failed to progress towards healing and comparisons made to explore the distribution of colonised flora within the wound. In total, 116 isolates were recovered (mean of 5.8 per ulcer) with highest recovery rates seen with swabs. Greatest agreement of colonisation and counts was found between swabs and absorbent polyvinyl acetate (PVA) foam disc, and also between PVA discs and biopsies. Lowest agreement was between the distribution of anaerobes and coryneforms in swabs and biopsies, suggesting uneven vertical distribution within ulcers. No justification for using routine biopsies in locally infected venous leg ulcers was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20051097      PMCID: PMC7951578          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00640.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  The 10(5) bacterial growth guideline: reassessing its clinical relevance in wound healing.

Authors:  Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 3.  A proactive approach to wound infection.

Authors:  A Kingsley
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2001 Apr 11-17

4.  Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection.

Authors:  Sue E Gardner; Rita A Frantz; Charles L Saltzman; Stephen L Hillis; Heeok Park; Melody Scherubel
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Biofilms in chronic wounds.

Authors:  Garth A James; Ellen Swogger; Randall Wolcott; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Patrick Secor; Jennifer Sestrich; John W Costerton; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Wound infection in clinical practice. An international consensus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Quantitative microbiology in the management of burn patients. II. Relationship between bacterial counts obtained by burn wound biopsy culture and surface alginate swab culture, with clinical outcome following burn surgery and change of dressings.

Authors:  J A Steer; R P Papini; A P Wilson; D A McGrouther; N Parkhouse
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Criteria for identifying wound infection.

Authors:  K F Cutting; K G Harding
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1994-06-02       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  Streptococci and aerococci associated with systemic infection in man.

Authors:  M T Parker; L C Ball
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Production of mucoid microcolonies by Pseudomonas aeruginosa within infected lungs in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  J Lam; R Chan; K Lam; J W Costerton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  9 in total

1.  A concern on investigation into the microbiological status of 'locally infected' leg ulcers.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs.

Authors:  Charne Nicole Miller; Keryln Carville; Nelly Newall; Suzanne Kapp; Gill Lewin; Leila Karimi; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.

Authors:  Donna E Angel; Peter Lloyd; Keryln Carville; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: some remarks about wound infection.

Authors:  Lucinda J Bessa; Paolo Fazii; Mara Di Giulio; Luigina Cellini
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Association Between Microbial Bioburden and Healing Outcomes in Venous Leg Ulcers: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Marie S Tuttle
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Laser irradiation effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms isolated from venous leg ulcer.

Authors:  Marina Baffoni; Lucinda J Bessa; Rossella Grande; Mara Di Giulio; Matteo Mongelli; Antonio Ciarelli; Luigina Cellini
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  The diagnosis of infection in chronic leg ulcers: A narrative review on clinical practice.

Authors:  Ut T Bui; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  The mesenchymal stromal cell secretome impairs methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms via cysteine protease activity in the equine model.

Authors:  Charlotte Marx; Sophia Gardner; Rebecca M Harman; Gerlinde R Van de Walle
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Microbiological Status of Venous Leg Ulcers and Its Predictors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Justyna Cwajda-Białasik; Paulina Mościcka; Arkadiusz Jawień; Maria Teresa Szewczyk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.