Literature DB >> 8719126

Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potential in normal subjects.

W P Hetrick1, C A Sandman, W E Bunney, Y Jin, S G Potkin, M H White.   

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) inhibitory mechanisms hypothesized to "gate" repetitive sensory inputs have been implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia. The present study investigated gender differences in inhibitory gating of evoked brain responses to repeated stimuli in normal subjects (30 women and 30 men) using an auditory conditioning-testing paradigm. Pairs of click stimuli (S1 and S2) were presented with a 0.5 s intrapair and a 10 s interpair interval. The amplitudes and latencies of the P50, N100, P180 components of the auditory evoked response to the conditioning (S1) and test response (S2) were measured, and the gating ratios were computed (T/C ratio = S2/S1 * 100). The amplitudes to S1 were not significantly different between men and women at P50, N100, or P180. However, women had significantly higher amplitudes to S2 at P50 (p = 0.03) and N100 (p = 0.04). The T/C ratios for women were higher (i.e., less suppression of response to S2) for P50 (p = 0.08) and N100 (p = 0.04) compared to men. The results suggested that differences in auditory gating between men and women were not due to biological differences in the P50 and N100 generators but possibly to differential influence of inhibitory mechanisms acting on the generator substrates of these evoked responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8719126     DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00067-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  28 in total

1.  Phenomenological dimensions of sensory gating.

Authors:  William P Hetrick; Molly A Erickson; David A Smith
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  The Role of Age, Gender, Education, and Intelligence in P50, N100, and P200 Auditory Sensory Gating.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; F Gerard Moeller; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Scott D Lane; Joel L Steinberg; Alan C Swann
Journal:  J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.333

3.  Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Kenneth Chelette; Robert D Skinner; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.579

4.  Effects of dopamine D2/D3 blockade on human sensory and sensorimotor gating in initially antipsychotic-naive, first-episode schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Signe Düring; Birte Y Glenthøj; Gitte Saltoft Andersen; Bob Oranje
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  P50 auditory sensory gating in first onset schizophrenics and normal healthy adults.

Authors:  Hongxing Wang; Mingdao Zhang; Xingshi Chen; Feiying Lou; Jianhua Liang; Chong Chen; Tiantao Shi; Qiulin Lu
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2007-10

6.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of adaptation in the human visual system: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Gizely N Andrade; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of COMT genotype on sensory gating and its modulation by nicotine: Differences in low and high P50 suppressors.

Authors:  S de la Salle; D Smith; J Choueiry; D Impey; T Philippe; H Dort; A Millar; P Albert; V Knott
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Sex differences in sensory gating of the thalamus during auditory interference of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; L Chang; E C Caparelli; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Aging-related decline in somatosensory inhibition of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Chia-Hsiung Cheng; Yung-Yang Lin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.