Literature DB >> 20648237

The Role of Age, Gender, Education, and Intelligence in P50, N100, and P200 Auditory Sensory Gating.

Marijn Lijffijt1, F Gerard Moeller, Nash N Boutros, Scott Burroughs, Scott D Lane, Joel L Steinberg, Alan C Swann.   

Abstract

P50, N100, and P200 auditory sensory gating reflect distinct mechanisms involved in protecting the integrity of higher-order functions. They have been implicated in multiple psychiatric disorders. Recent studies showed the (limited) effects of age and gender on sensory gating in control subjects, suggesting there may be other sources of variance. Two potential sources may be education and intelligence (intellectual capability), variables that frequently differ across studies and across experimental groups. We explored potential effects of age, gender, education, and intelligence (Shipley intelligence scale) on P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating measured with the paired-click paradigm in 60 healthy subjects recruited from the general population. Increased intellectual capability related to stronger N100 and P200 gating and more pronounced N100 and P200 amplitudes. In addition, increased age related to weaker P200 gating and smaller P200 amplitudes. Gender had negligible effects. Intellectual capability or age could contribute to variation in N100 or P200 auditory sensory gating and should be controlled for when studying sensory gating in clinical and control groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20648237      PMCID: PMC2905882          DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803.23.2.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0269-8803            Impact factor:   1.333


  43 in total

1.  Enhancement of auditory sensory gating and stimulus-bound gamma band (40 Hz) oscillations in heavy tobacco smokers.

Authors:  Helen J Crawford; Dennis McClain-Furmanski; Neal Castagnoli; Kay Castagnoli
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response.

Authors:  G Zouridakis; N N Boutros
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations.

Authors:  K Jerger; C Biggins; G Fein
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Prepulse inhibition and P50 suppression: commonalities and dissociations.

Authors:  Bob Oranje; Mark A Geyer; Koen B E Bocker; J Leon Kenemans; Marinus N Verbaten
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; P Soveri; T Järvilehto
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-02

6.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  P50 sensory gating in panic disorder.

Authors:  Eduardo S Ghisolfi; Elizeth Heldt; Ana Paula Zanardo; Ivo M Strimitzer; Alexandre S Prokopiuk; Jefferson Becker; Aristides V Cordioli; Gisele G Manfro; Diogo R Lara
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Stacey L Meier; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Sensory gating deficits during the mid-latency phase of information processing in medicated schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Nashaat N Boutros; Oleg Korzyukov; Ben Jansen; Alan Feingold; Morris Bell
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2004-05-30       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  A meta-analysis of P50 studies in patients with schizophrenia and relatives: differences in methodology between research groups.

Authors:  O M de Wilde; L J Bour; P M Dingemans; J H T M Koelman; D H Linszen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mechanisms of Long-Latency Paired Pulse Suppression: MEG Study.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Takeuchi; Kohei Fujita; Tomoya Taniguchi; Tomoaki Kinukawa; Shunsuke Sugiyama; Kousuke Kanemoto; Makoto Nishihara; Koji Inui
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Disruption of sensory gating by moderate alcohol doses.

Authors:  Alfredo L Sklar; Sara Jo Nixon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Diabetes-Associated Changes in Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Relation to Normal Aging.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Daniel McDermott; Jane Gordon; Donald Austin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Early auditory processing evoked potentials (N100) show a continuum of blunting from clinical high risk to psychosis in a pediatric sample.

Authors:  Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Eugene D'Angelo; Larry J Seidman; Sarah Gumlak; April Kim; Kristen A Woodberry; Ashley Rober; Sahil Tembulkar; Kelsey Graber; Kyle O'Donnell; Hesham M Hamoda; Kara Kimball; Alexander Rotenberg; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan; Frank H Duffy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The PDE5 inhibitor vardenafil does not affect auditory sensory gating in rats and humans.

Authors:  O A H Reneerkens; A Sambeth; M A Van Duinen; A Blokland; H W M Steinbusch; J Prickaerts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Inhibitory Control Impairment on Somatosensory Gating Due to Aging: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Juan L Terrasa; Pedro Montoya; Ana M González-Roldán; Carolina Sitges
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A diagnostic model incorporating P50 sensory gating and neuropsychological tests for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jia-Chi Shan; Chih-Min Liu; Ming-Jang Chiu; Chen-Chung Liu; Yi-Ling Chien; Tzung-Jeng Hwang; Yi-Ting Lin; Ming H Hsieh; Fu-Shan Jaw; Hai-Gwo Hwu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  N100 Repetition Suppression Indexes Neuroplastic Defects in Clinical High Risk and Psychotic Youth.

Authors:  Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Eugene D'Angelo; Larry J Seidman; Sarah Gumlak; April Kim; Kristen A Woodberry; Ashley Rober; Sahil Tembulkar; Kyle O'Donnell; Hesham M Hamoda; Kara Kimball; Alexander Rotenberg; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan; Frank H Duffy
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  The relation between schizotypy and early attention to rejecting interactions: The influence of neuroticism.

Authors:  Preethi Premkumar; Juliana Onwumere; Jacobo Albert; Dominique Kessel; Veena Kumari; Elizabeth Kuipers; Luis Carretié
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Neurophysiological Effects of Aging: A P200 ERP Study.

Authors:  Ali K Bourisly; Ali Shuaib
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.