Literature DB >> 22068744

Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects.

Adam J Woods1, John W Philbeck, Kenneth Chelette, Robert D Skinner, Edgar Garcia-Rill, Mark Mennemeier.   

Abstract

The present study examined how cold pressor stimulation influences electrophysiological correlates of arousal. We measured the P50 auditory evoked response potential in two groups of subjects who immersed their foot in either cold (0-2°C) or room temperature (22-24°C) water for 50 seconds. The P50, which was recorded before and after stimulation, is sleep-state dependent and sensitive to states of arousal in clinical populations. We found a significant reduction in P50 amplitude after exposure to cold, but not room temperature water. In comparison with other studies, these results indicate that cold pressor stimulation in normal subjects may evoke a regulatory process that modulates the P50 amplitude, perhaps to preserve the integrity of sensory perception, even as autonomic and subjective aspects of arousal increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22068744      PMCID: PMC3262163     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)        ISSN: 0065-1400            Impact factor:   1.579


  41 in total

1.  Regional brain activation in humans during respiratory and blood pressure challenges.

Authors:  R M Harper; D Gozal; R Bandler; D Spriggs; J Lee; J Alger
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 2.  The neuronal basis for consciousness.

Authors:  R Llinás; U Ribary; D Contreras; C Pedroarena
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Decreased habituation of midlatency auditory evoked responses in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  C Teo; L Rasco; K al-Mefty; R D Skinner; F A Boop; E Garcia-Rill
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  A comparison of isometric exercise, cold pressor stimulation and dynamic exercise in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  I N Findlay; G Gillen; A D Cunningham; A T Elliott; T Aitchison; H J Dargie
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  The cold pressor test: vascular and myocardial response patterns and their stability.

Authors:  P G Saab; M M Llabre; B E Hurwitz; N Schneiderman; W Wohlgemuth; L A Durel; C Massie; J Nagel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating.

Authors:  D A Smith; N N Boutros; S B Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potential in normal subjects.

Authors:  W P Hetrick; C A Sandman; W E Bunney; Y Jin; S G Potkin; M H White
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Prefrontal cortex gating of auditory transmission in humans.

Authors:  R T Knight; D Scabini; D L Woods
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1989-12-18       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Muscle sympathetic nerve activity during cold pressor test in patients with cerebrovascular accidents.

Authors:  T Mizushima; F Tajima; T Nakamura; M Yamamoto; K H Lee; H Ogata
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Transient impairment in P50 auditory sensory gating induced by a cold-pressor test.

Authors:  M R Johnson; L E Adler
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of cold pressor stress on the human startle response.

Authors:  Christian E Deuter; Linn K Kuehl; Terry D Blumenthal; André Schulz; Melly S Oitzl; Hartmut Schachinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Acute Stress and Gender Effects in Sensory Gating of the Auditory Evoked Potential in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Zengyou Xin; Simeng Gu; Wei Wang; Yi Lei; Hong Li
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Hyper-arousal decreases human visual thresholds.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Philip Wirtz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.