Literature DB >> 8718771

The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates.

E J Custers1, H P Boshuizen, H G Schmidt.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component (enabling conditions vs. consequences) on the speed of case information processing and subjective disease probabilities. It was hypothesized that expert subjects would process case information faster than nonexpert subjects, that typical information would be processed faster than atypical information, and that an interaction would be found between expertise level, typicality, and illness script: Experts were expected to be sensitive to typicality of both illness script components, while advanced students would be sensitive only to typicality of consequences. This sensitivity would also be reflected in assigned probability estimates. The data supported the predictions concerning the effects of expertise level and typicality; it was also found that expert physicians are particularly sensitive to a combination of prototypical enabling conditions and prototypical consequences. Implications of these results for the illness script theory are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8718771     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication.

Authors:  H G Schmidt; G R Norman; H P Boshuizen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task.

Authors:  L R Brooks; G R Norman; S W Allen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

3.  Contextual factors in the activation of first diagnostic hypotheses: expert-novice differences.

Authors:  P P Hobus; H G Schmidt; H P Boshuizen; V L Patel
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  The clinical reasoning process.

Authors:  H S Barrows; P J Feltovich
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Determinants of diagnostic hypothesis generation: effects of information, base rates, and experience.

Authors:  E U Weber; U Böckenholt; D J Hilton; B Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall.

Authors:  H G Schmidt; H P Boshuizen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

7.  The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice.

Authors:  H S Barrows; G R Norman; V R Neufeld; J W Feightner
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 0.825

8.  Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task.

Authors:  D A Smith; A C Graesser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-11
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Why study narrative?

Authors:  T Greenhaigh; B Hurwitz
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Narrative based medicine: why study narrative?

Authors:  T Greenhalgh; B Hurwitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

3.  Methods and outcomes for the remediation of clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Jeannette Guerrasio; Eva M Aagaard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The granularity of medical narratives and its effect on the speed and completeness of information retrieval.

Authors:  H J Tange; H C Schouten; A D Kester; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Expertise in clinical psychology. The effects of university training and practical experience on expertise in clinical psychology.

Authors:  Sabine Vollmer; Hans Spada; Franz Caspar; Salome Burri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-27

6.  General practitioners' reasoning when considering the diagnosis heart failure: a think-aloud study.

Authors:  Ylva Skånér; Lars Backlund; Henry Montgomery; Johan Bring; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Five decades of research and theorization on clinical reasoning: a critical review.

Authors:  Shahram Yazdani; Maryam Hoseini Abardeh
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-27

8.  Strategies for developing pre-clinical medical students' clinical reasoning based on illness script formation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jihyun Si
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-01

9.  A comprehensive test of clinical reasoning for medical students: An olympiad experience in Iran.

Authors:  Alireza Monajemi; Kamran Soltani Arabshahi; Akbar Soltani; Farshid Arbabi; Roghieh Akbari; Eugene Custers; Arash Hadadgar; Fatemeh Hadizadeh; Tahereh Changiz; Peyman Adibi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2012-03-28

10.  Experienced physicians benefit from analyzing initial diagnostic hypotheses.

Authors:  Adam Bass; Colin Geddes; Bruce Wright; Sylvain Coderre; Remy Rikers; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2013-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.