Literature DB >> 8409853

Determinants of diagnostic hypothesis generation: effects of information, base rates, and experience.

E U Weber1, U Böckenholt, D J Hilton, B Wallace.   

Abstract

Physicians generated diagnostic hypotheses for case histories for which 2 types of diagnoses were plausible, with one having a higher population base rate but less severe clinical consequences than the other. The number of clinical and background symptoms pointing towards the 2 diagnoses was factorially manipulated. The order and frequency with which physicians generated hypotheses varied with the amount of relevant clinical and background information and as a function of population incidence rates, with little evidence of base rate neglect. Availability of a hypothesis, made possible by diagnosis of a similar case before, also made doctors generate this diagnosis earlier and more frequently. Physicians' experience affected hypothesis generation solely by increasing the availability of similar cases. The results are consistent with the use of similarity-based hypothesis generation processes that operate on memory for prior cases.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8409853     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Use of base rates and case cue information in making likelihood estimates.

Authors:  Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino; Edmund Fantino; Nicholas Van Borst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

2.  The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates.

Authors:  E J Custers; H P Boshuizen; H G Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

3.  Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning.

Authors:  Agnes Scholz; Josef F Krems; Georg Jahn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

4.  Memory states influence value-based decisions.

Authors:  Katherine D Duncan; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-11

5.  A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments.

Authors:  Sofia B Jacinto; Cara C Lewis; João N Braga; Kelli Scott
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2016-04-18

6.  Sex Differences in Symptom Phenotypes Among Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  John E Brush; Alexandra M Hajduk; Erich J Greene; Rachel P Dreyer; Harlan M Krumholz; Sarwat I Chaudhry
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Sex Differences in Symptom Phenotypes Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  John E Brush; Harlan M Krumholz; Erich J Greene; Rachel P Dreyer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-02-17

8.  Severity, Irritability, Nature, Stage, and Stability (SINSS): A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Evan J Petersen; Stephanie M Thurmond; Gail M Jensen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Implications of cognitive load for hypothesis generation and probability judgment.

Authors:  Amber M Sprenger; Michael R Dougherty; Sharona M Atkins; Ana M Franco-Watkins; Rick P Thomas; Nicholas Lange; Brandon Abbs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-17

10.  The Role of Physicians' First Impressions in the Diagnosis of Possible Cancers without Alarm Symptoms.

Authors:  Olga Kostopoulou; Miroslav Sirota; Thomas Round; Shyamalee Samaranayaka; Brendan C Delaney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.