Literature DB >> 8718768

Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences.

G S Waters1, D Caplan.   

Abstract

Three experiments explored the relationship between verbal working memory capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. In Experiment 1, subjects with high, medium, and low working memory spans made acceptability judgments about garden path and control sentences under whole sentence and rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) conditions. There were no significant differences between subjects with different working memory spans in the comprehension of garden path sentences in either condition. In Experiments 2A and 2B, subjects with high and low working memory spans were tested on the same materials at three RSVP rates. There were no significant differences between subjects with different working memory spans in the magnitude of the effect of garden path sentences at any presentation rate. The results suggest that working memory capacity, as measured by the Daneman and Carpenter (1980) reading span task, is not a major determinant of individual differences in the processing of garden path sentences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8718768     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.

Authors:  M C MacDonald; M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  D Caplan; C Baker; F Dehaut
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-11

4.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing.

Authors:  G Altmann; M Steedman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-12

5.  Sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  E Rochon; G S Waters; D Caplan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total
  16 in total

1.  Disambiguating information and memory resources in children's processing of Italian relative clauses.

Authors:  Fabrizio Arosio; Maria Teresa Guasti; Natale Stucchi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-04

2.  Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: a hierarchical linear modeling analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

3.  A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-18

4.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

6.  Individual differences in working memory and reasoning-remembering relationships in solving class-inclusion problems.

Authors:  M L Howe; F M Rabinowitz; T L Powell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

7.  The relation between working memory and language comprehension in signers and speakers.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Marcel R Giezen; Jennifer A F Petrich; Erin Spurgeon; Lucinda O'Grady Farnady
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-05-05

8.  Working memory and on-line sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  G S Waters; D Caplan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1997-07

Review 9.  Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

10.  Deaf readers' response to syntactic complexity: evidence from self-paced reading.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler; David P Corina; Jill P Morford; Sarah Hafer; Liv J Hoversten
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.