Literature DB >> 19377881

A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.

Matthew J Traxler1.   

Abstract

An eye-movement monitoring experiment investigated readers' response to temporarily ambiguous sentences. The sentences were ambiguous because a relative clause could attach to one of two preceding nouns. Semantic information disambiguated the sentences. Working memory considerations predict an overall preference for the second of the two nouns, as does the late closure principle (Frazier, On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut. West Bend, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1979). Previous studies assessing preferences for such items have obtained mixed results. On-line assessments show that working memory affects the degree of preference for the first noun, with lower capacity readers having a greater preference for the second noun (Felser et al., Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 11, 127-163, 2003; Traxler, Memory & Cognition, 35, 1107-1121, 2007). Off-line assessments indicate the opposite pattern of preferences when the test sentences are displayed on a single line (Swets et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 64-81, 2007). However, when implicit prosody is manipulated by displaying the sentences with a break between the second noun and the relative clause, the off-line assessments indicate that readers prefer to attach the relative clause to the first noun. In this experiment, readers' undertook a working memory assessment and then read test sentences that were displayed across two lines, with a break appearing after the second noun and before the relative clause. The eye-tracking data indicated an overall preference to attach the relative clause to the first noun, and there was little indication that working memory moderated the degree of preference for this configuration. Hence, it appears that readers' implicit prosodic contours rapidly affect resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19377881     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-009-9102-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  19 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures.

Authors:  Gloria S Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

Review 3.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: a hierarchical linear modeling analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.

Authors:  S R Speer; M M Kjelgaard; K M Dobroth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

8.  The capacity theory of comprehension: new frontiers of evidence and arguments.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter; T A Keller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Long-term working memory.

Authors:  K A Ericsson; W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.

Authors:  M Carreiras; C Clifton
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Working Memory Capacity and Relative Clause Attachment Preference of Persian EFL Learners: Does Segmentation Play Any Role?

Authors:  Mohammad Hadi Mahmoodi; Hamidreza Sheykholmoluki; Mohammad Reza Zoghipaydar; Saeed Shahsavari
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-01-11

3.  It's hard to offend the college: effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Sarah Grison; Xuefei Gao; Kiel Christianson; Daniel G Morrow; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-11-30

Review 5.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 20.229

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.