Literature DB >> 8717550

Hip fractures: incidence, risk factors, energy absorption, and prevention.

J B Lauritzen1.   

Abstract

The present review summarizes the pathogenic mechanisms leading to hip fracture based on epidemiological, experimental, and controlled clinical studies. The estimated lifetime risk of hip fracture is about 14% in postmenopausal women and 6% in men. The incidence of hip fractures increases exponentially with aging, but the time trend in increasing age-specific incidence may finally reach a plateau. Postmenopausal women suffering earlier non-hip fractures have an increased risk of later hip fracture. The relative risk is highest within the first years following the fracture. Nursing home residents have a high risk of hip fracture (annual rate of 5-6%), and their incidence of falls is about 1.5 falls/person per year. Most hip fractures are a result of a direct trauma against the hip. The incidence of falls on the hip among nursing home residents is about 0.29 falls/person per year and about 20% of these traumas lead to hip fracture. Women with hip fractures have a lower body weight compared with controls, and they may also have less soft tissue covering the hip, even when adjusted for body mass index, indicating a more android body habitus. Experimental studies show that the passive energy absorption in soft tissue covering the hip may influence the risk of hip fracture and be an important determinant for the development of hip fracture, perhaps even more important than bone strength. External hip protectors were developed and tested in an open randomized nursing home study. The rate of hip fracture was reduced by 50%, corresponding to 9 of 247 residents saved from sustaining a hip fracture. This review points to the essentials in the development of hip fracture: risk of fall; type of fall; type of impact; energy absorption; and last, bone strength, which is the final permissive factor leading to hip fracture. Risk estimation and prevention of hip fracture may prove realistic when these issues are taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8717550     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00382-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  18 in total

Review 1.  Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.

Authors:  S A Yahaya; Z M Ripin; M I Z Ridzwan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Is GSN significant for hip BMD in female Caucasians?

Authors:  Fei-Yan Deng; Wei Zhu; Yong Zeng; Ji-Gang Zhang; Na Yu; Yao-Zhong Liu; Yong-Jun Liu; Qing Tian; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Risk of hip/femur fractures during the initiation period of α-adrenoceptor blocker therapy among elderly males: a self-controlled case series study.

Authors:  Chao-Lun Lai; Raymond Nien-Chen Kuo; Ho-Min Chen; Ming-Fong Chen; Kinwei Arnold Chan; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The orthopaedic treatment of fragility fractures.

Authors:  Mirco Pietri; Silvia Lucarini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2007-05

5.  A model for time to fracture with a shock stream superimposed on progressive degradation: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Xin He; G A Whitmore; Geok Yan Loo; Marc C Hochberg; Mei-Ling Ting Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Dietary Supplementation to Prevent Bone Mineral Density Loss: A Food Pyramid.

Authors:  Mariangela Rondanelli; Milena Anna Faliva; Gaetan Claude Barrile; Alessandro Cavioni; Francesca Mansueto; Giuseppe Mazzola; Letizia Oberto; Zaira Patelli; Martina Pirola; Alice Tartara; Antonella Riva; Giovanna Petrangolini; Gabriella Peroni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes.

Authors:  C Cryer; A Knox; D Martin; J Barlow
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.399

8.  Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Constance L Slaboch; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The treatment of stable and unstable proximal femoral fractures with a new trochanteric nail: results of a multicentre study with the Veronail.

Authors:  Franco Lavini; L Renzi-Brivio; R Aulisa; F Cherubino; P L Di Seglio; N Galante; W Leonardi; M Manca
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2008-03-29

10.  Use of hormone replacement therapy among Danish nurses at increased risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yrsa Andersen Hundrup; Henrik Thoning; Niels Kristian Rasmussen; Erik Bernhard Obel; John Philip
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.